Rappler 
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@Rappler/
More videos on Rappler: https://www.rappler.com/video Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and across the globe. Don’t get climate change? Watch an animation explaining the phenomenon as a 12-year-old would Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. Help us stay free and independent of political pressure and commercial interests: https://r3.rappler.com/crowdfunding Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. You can help power our investigative fund by donating to our crowdfunding: https://donate.rappler.com/
source
About The Author
Ok if you we're in high school you would have leaned about earth's greenhouse effect provides an average 10°F (5.55°C ) to earth's average temperature from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor which could completely absorbed all the greenhouse energy within 20 meters of the earth's surface. There is no greenhouse energy left after 20 meters from the surface so it further heat transfer is by convection which is molecules bumping into each other. This means that increasing noncondensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane don't actually have the ability to add more temperature retention to earth's greenhouse effect because all the energy that can loosely interact with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gas molecules is considered to have been completely absorbed.
Carbon dioxide has about 1/4% share in earth's greenhouse effect on average which could be removed or greatly increased and since water vapor holds earth's greenhouse effect in heavy satiation that change would make no difference to the heat retention of earth's greenhouse effect. This why earth's greenhouse effect is sometimes simply said to come from water vapor. You maybe worried about adults talking about a warming planet.. The earth has not gotten any hotter since1991 when global warming was reported at 1.1°C and it is now 2023! So you shouldn't be scared about some adults scaring you about the world quickly becoming over heated! Global warming has been around 1°C for the past thirty years. Some adults unfortunately don't behave as responsible adults. Bad adults scare children to benefit themselves.
Adorable and informative, well done.
False and moronic. Humans don't control or effect the climate
fimosis
como no tener fimosis
Ambilis namn😅
Dr. Deborah Chung et al. found that the carbon fiber composite can be produced as either a negative resistance or a positive resistance, by controlling the production process. (Shoukai Wang and D.D.L. Chung, "Apparent negative electrical resistance in carbon fiber composites," Composites, Part B, Vol. 30, 1999, p. 579-590.)
In a July 9, 1998 keynote address at the Fifth International Conference on Composites Engineering in Las Vegas, Dr. Deborah D. L. Chung, professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at University at Buffalo (UB), reported that she had observed apparent negative resistance in interfaces between layers of carbon fibers in a composite material. Professor Chung holds the Niagara Mohawk Chair in Materials Research at UB and is internationally recognized for her work in smart materials and carbon composites. The negative resistance was observed in a direction perpendicular to the fiber layers. Her team tested the negative resistance effect thoroughly, for a year in the laboratory. There is no question at all about it being a true negative resistor. If there is a team in this country anywhere qualified to test a negative resistance effect in carbon materials, it is Professor Chung and her team at UB.
On the website for the University of Buffalo, it was announced that the invention would be offered for commercial licensing. A Technical Data Package was available for major companies interested in licensing and signing the proper non-disclosure agreements. Shortly thereafter this was no longer true, the data package was no longer available, and there was an indefinite hold on licensing and commercialization. It is still on hold as of this writing. It is believed that the University had and has several substantial U.S. government contracts. It is not clear where Chung's work was being performed on one of them or not. We leave it to the reader to make his or her own interpretation of the real meaning of that sudden dramatic shift at the University, and what may be behind the University's sudden withdrawal of Chung's negative resistor from commercial exploitation. So it remains to be seen whether Professor Chung's dramatic invention ever is allowed to be made public, or to make it to market. Certainly she is a brave and noble scientist, and we are rooting most enthusiastically for her success.
Now there's one for the environmental activists, if they can really get their act together. Why not swing all that power and clout they possess into action, demanding to know what has happened to Chung's negative resistor? After all, such a unit can easily be developed into systems that will power the world, once the control of the basic effect is worked out — which in this case has already been done by Chung and her team. If the Environmental Community really wishes to do something dramatic to initiate what could be a rapid solution to the hydrocarbon wastes pollution of the planet, this is their big chance.
But they'll have to have some real guts and not just "chicken out" when ordered to back off from Chung's negative resistor by all sorts of powers. On this one they will have to be prepared to slug it out in the trenches, and it will be close quarters and bloody. They will also have to be prepared to risk their lives. Instead of helping the real enemies of the environment as they did in the Kyoto treaty, they will be in blunt, eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation with them. The velvet gloves will assuredly come off the mailed fists.
No 5 naon ey
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Climate Change marketing is just that, marketing. What the marketing of climate change is pushing is that human caused noncondensing greenhouse gas emissions can increase the always-in-saturation greenhouse effect, which is impossible. Earth's greenhouse effect is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor to add 10°F (5.55°C) to earth's average temperature that takes place within 20 meters of radiating surface. A key attribute of climate change marketing is global warming which has been paused at about 1°C since the early 1990s. There has been no significant 2/10°C increase in global warming since the late 1980s. Global warming was reported at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. Climate change marketing video's don't typically use official global warming temperatures.
Reading the United Nation's IPCC science report in the back pages it has a statement of data transparency where it states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude and only that one altitude! All greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is considered to have been completely absorbed by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the surface. There is no greenhouse radiant energy at 20,000 meters altitude. That altitude statement of 20,000 meters sampling is an acknowledgment the IPCC is not discussing active greenhouse gases in a manor relevant to global warming. This is the same type of marketing where a beverage is labeled "All Natural Fruit Flavors" then reading the ingredients it states the truth "contains no actual fruit juices".
Arctic warming is strongly indicative from warmer Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. This is a redistribution of the earth's heat. There is a large increase in heat absorption when the ice and snow melt off leaving open water and land.
Amazing
🎉
nice
Sooner
6A 9 猜猜我是誰
ok
I also love
Good but not last but least
skibidi sigma explanation of climate change, very rizzy
I haaate people who believe in climate change. They are tree lovers so creepy and gross
Clark Patricia Wilson Larry White Maria