ACCIONA 
ACCIONA presents a video about the process and merits of reaching carbon neutrality. The need for carbon neutrality is dire now that the relationship between emissions of greenhouse gases and climate change is a scientific certainty. The world will reach carbon neutrality when it reduces its net carbon emissions equal zero. For this to be possible, we must reduce our dependence on energy derived from fossil fuels, improve the efficiency of our energy processes, and invest in sustainable development.
More information at: http://www.activesustainability.com/climate-change/what-is-carbon-neutrality/
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/interacciona1?sub_confirmation=1
Website: https://www.acciona.com/
–Social Media–
Twitter: https://twitter.com/acciona_en
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ACCIONA.English/
LinkedIn: http://acciona.sa/YsSOM
Google +: http://acciona.sa/YsT6T
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/acciona/
source
About The Author
stop industry factories that produces waste like fluoride that is poison and making things or using things that cause radiation poison whatever more is out there they do
Is the idea: There are only a set amount of carbon credits each year and if you buy extra from one business, then they would not be able to pollute as much (assuming they don’t buy extra credits of their own if any are left in circulation that year), and if someone goes over the carbon limits they pay a fine?
Wouldn’t it be efficient to just permanently shut down most big polluters; and impose high taxes on all fossil fuels that we rely on now but plan to phase out; and provide a heavily subsidised green power (not just solar, but miniature hydro, geo thermal, and kinetic too).
If it was that bad it shouldn’t be a “choice” to do the right thing.
Carbon neutral is a term which is a complete misnomer. Do you mean CO2 neutral??? What do you mean? I hope we aren't "carbon neutral". The human body is like 18.5% carbon and when we breath we expel CO2. So if a person breaths, it is impossible to be CO2 neutral. As for GLOBAL WARMING it is a 100% hoax! It is a theory and NOT a universal law! For example, Newton's 3 Universal Laws of Motion can be confirmed in a laboratory with basic test apparatus and the test can be repeated over and over and over again with the identical outcome. The same experiment can be reproduced in ANY laboratory and guess what? The results will be absolutely the same! Now then, with the billions of dollars spend on research and years investigating, why hasn't GLOBAL WARMING or "Climate Change" been confirmed using the Scientific Method and in a similar manner to Newton's Laws???? Because it CANNOT BE CONFIRMED!! And when a theory cannot be confirmed, then it remains a theory until if/when someone develops an experiment and procedure. Climate Change is JUNK SCIENCE!
What a bunch of CRAP . Putting humanity back to the stone age , by 2050.
I don't see "neutrality" in the normal meaning of the word, I only see reduction, giving me the feeling that language is being used to pull the wool over my eyes. Is this perhaps just part of the commecialisation of global warming. Buy more new stuff to resolve the problems caused by buying too much new stuff?
Wrong information. Carbon neutral mean sustainable.not good enough. Goggle biomass wood pellet is distroying forest. Yes million of ton forest are exported to the European country to burn in power plants that switch from coal. But it 3 times nmore carbon releases but the say it's sustainable we can grow it back. Wrong. Takes 10 yr and developers will offer million fir homes and malls useing more burn forest. Now any 2 people can get a pellets n mechine and cut down forest and ship the pellets over sea. Who going to know? That happing in South A.
So now carbon neutral is a lie. Goggle that . Ton of tubes too of forest gone in the USA
and what about animal agriculture???
Thank you for your video! It is short and helpful! Very informative in a short amount of time. Good to educate on carbon neutrality!
Thank you for making this video
and thank u for helping me
I have H°W to tell what is CARBON NUTRIALITY, pls do not mind my spelling
ah yes selling Co2 over seas really solves the offset issue. last i checked trees turn Co2 into oxygen, the stuff we breath?
Amazing vedeo lesson
Thanks for the vedio it's really helping
No carbon no life !!!!!!!! :))
Carbon neutrality means emitting enough carbon so that the earth’s carbon sinks (trees and plants, oceans) can absorb them, thus making the net emission zero. It wasn’t explained in the video.
Thank you for making this video about carbon neutrality, It really helped me a lot
I learned about the direction we should be heading for carbon neutrality and the government's efforts.
I came here with an open mind, I left knowing without a doubt this is all a scam. "climate change is definitely real, that's why we have to tell you this in the first 5 seconds of the video". And instead of protecting habitats and encouraging reforestation which captures carbon and turns it into wood, we are going send our corrupt politicians and bureaucrats to negotiate with mega corporations to make sure that the global fascist takeover is complete, all while whipping up in hysteria in the smooth brains "the earth is going to end in 10 years!!!!!"
Waste of money Methane is associated with warming. Fools go off half-cocked.
If this was coordinated 7 years ago why does it only have 30+ comments?
This is great in theory. Where is the practical application?
Thanks for explaining that "carbon neutral" is a total lie. That figures.
This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. The cause of global warming is not know in 2024. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. Global warming has been staled at about 1°C since 1992.
Increasing average global temperatures are greatly meaningless to modern human lives not eliciting concern. In the early 1980s to promote the need to prepare for increasing average global temperatures the term Climate Change was given for the already known prediction of stronger Gulf of Mexico hurricanes when global warming reached 1.5°C on track to take place in 2010. That required stronger Gulf of Mexico oil platform design and builds talking place in the 1970s.
This was qualifiedly a change in human activity that is in some sense due to a change in climate or Climate Change. There was also expected increasing sea levels from warmer expanding sea water. The term Climate Change is much more attention provoking than the term Global Warming even though no credible Climate Change, and very minimal at that, would take place until global warming reached 1.5°C.
There were no plausible mechanisms from the current science in 1980 that could cause increasing average global temperatures. In the 1950s earth’s atmosphere had been greatly studied and the characteristics of its major gases greatly understood. Earth’s saturated greenhouse effect from water vapor adding 10°F (5.55°C) to earth’s average temperature was well known. In was taught in 1970s US public science education.
It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor.
The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases.
Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases.
At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F).
Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface.
Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet.
0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2.
The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.