
It’s being described by the scientists who wrote it as a “clarion bell” – a report warning the world that unprecedented and immediate change is needed to prevent a climate catastrophe.
(Click to subscribe for more Channel 4 News videos.
https://www.youtube.com/channel4news?sub_confirmation=1)
A report by the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change for the United Nations says we need to act without delay to prevent the destruction of coral reefs and stop sea levels rising by as much as ten centimetres. If that happened large parts of the world could become uninhabitable.
source
Quick quick let’s give up all our rights in order to save the planet lol agenda 21 2030. We need population reduction according to these elected pushing this agenda, that’s a good way to reduce c02, if only there were some kind of universal vaccine coming that people could take which will sterilise us;)
If a catastrophist doesn't propose nuclear as a solution, all their words are hollow.
Dont worry We'll all be here listening to these lunatics in 12 years.
UTTER BOLLOVKS. CO2 is the stuff of life …..These programmes are presented by ignorant people spreading headline propaganda…..Even the IPCC says there is no need for alarm ….
This is doomsayers drunk on celebrity and state funding …They have been saying this BS for the last 50 years ……
45% of all land mass used for animal agruculture?? 😂😂😂😂
Lol. Religious extremist here and don't even realize it.
3 degrees by the end of century? Yall can't predict if it's going to rain next week but 100 yrs? 😂🤯
World ending but no nuclear power ? This is the real science deniers
If we were ever serious about climate change, how did/does transnational
globalization help? Concentrating manufacturing in China and Southeast
Asia means they bear the brunt of the pollution and goods that are
produced in those countries travel THOUSANDS OF MILES to market in
Europe, the United States and Canada. The ships, cargo and freight are
acidifying the oceans as they dump their sewage and causing the die-off of coral
reefs. Manufacturing locally vs. making China the supplier of all the
world's needs would seem to be a step in the right direction. If we're
serious about climate change, we'll stop outsourcing everything we
depend on for modern life. It's not only a climate threat, it's a
national security risk to allow China to become the world's only super
power by virtue of the fact that they're the only ones who have a robust
manufacturing base and thus also the ability to dramatically expand
their military dominance. We're already seeing China rattle their sabers!
By how much? 1 millionth of a percent?
It's not even eating meat that bothers me. It's the abuse animals go through.
They could have prevented global warming by preventing the industrial revolution.
Or what? Are people get to be sent off the planet like superman?
Duterium is the answer of replacing clean energy.
It's found in all the archipelago in the Philippines.
President Marcos already hired scientist confirmed it.
Ita super true
Hey!! I've seen this before! It's a classic!! They keep re-running the same narrative every few years, and claim the planet has 12 years left. They said it in 2020, 2016, 2012, 2008, 2000, 1994, 1990, and even back when I was a kid in the 1970s!
I love classics.
You are all foolish, falling for this alarmism. We've been polluting the environment since the industrial age, and went through a mini ice age in the 70s. Yet we're still here. And your solution is to pay more taxes to government, throw unjustified tax dollars on poor countries (including China, who wants a handout because they ridiculously claim they are still a developing country), and mine rare earth minerals at significant environmental cost to make electric cars that most people will never be able to afford. You also want to eliminate affordable energy for wind and solar, which will drive prices up for lower income families; meanwhile you will give significant subsidies to the wealthy who can afford luxury electric cars. Climate alarmism is nothing but a power grab.
Mostly dangerous drivel. Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. The IPCC reports in AR6, chapter 11, "The total global frequency of TC [tropical cyclone] formation will decrease or remain unchanged with increasing global warming (medium confidence)." Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence).
The Global Land Precipitation Anomaly from AR5 will disappoint with deviations from the average increasing by 0.2% per decade, but if you look at the actual data, it's just very variable over the decades.
Drought appears to be decreasing (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017.
Deaths from natural disasters are about 0.6% of what they were a century ago.
What else? Oh, deserts like the Sahara have shrunk considerably and the Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime (NASA).
On extinction the rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years. At that frequency it will take nearly 190,000 years to reach 15% extinction i.e. a mass extinction.
There is no climate crisis. This video is anti-humanist.
I’m ready for extinction. Let’s stop pretending there is another outcome here.
Mommy, how did the earth get ruined?
Cow farts, dear. Cow farts.
🐄 💨
The stats are clear, You mean your stats are clear, Yes it's always alarming, Did you hear the waters around the equator in the Atlantic ocean are cooling🤣lol