British Council 
Author and environmentalist Neil Gaiman spoke about the importance of acting on climate change at the British Council’s Conversation for Change panel on 3 June 2021.
The Climate Connection brings people around the world together to meet the challenges of climate change. Through arts and culture, education and the English language, it is about ideas, innovation and real change.
The Climate Connection: https://www.britishcouncil.org/climate-connection
The UK is committed to working with all countries and joining forces with civil society, companies and people on the frontline of climate change to inspire climate action ahead of COP26.
COP26: https://ukcop26.org/
The British Council builds connections, understanding and trust between people in the UK and other countries through arts and culture, education and the English language.
Visit our website: https://www.britishcouncil.org/
source
About The Author
What is it precisely about destructive humanity that you sense is so important to preserve?
Ok
Remember when the British council didn’t deal in propaganda?
Grand solar minimum.. cooling. Pole shift. Weather .. crops.. food scarcity
One word: Catastrophism. It’s cyclical. Stop blaming humans for what they can’t control.
Carbon Dioxide is plant food. Not harmful at all. This guy is another lying watermelon.
It’s not humans causing climate change. It’s always been the sun. Grand solar minimum is here.
more propaganda
At 3:18 this Gaiman says that as a storyteller he has to tell people untruths (lies) in order to achieve some other objective. In my opinion that's a very serious admission. He's confessing to being a liar in order to push an agenda. That's what the scummiest politicians do. And we all know we can't trust a word they say. How do we know he isn't telling lies NOW, to achieve an objective. How would we know? We wouldn't would we? Being that he is a self-confessed teller of untruths, I would say his credibility is zero.
Secondly, his story about the introduction of rabbits and stoats into New Zealand, whilst factual, the notion of those events somehow being linked to climate change, lacks credibility. I don't see the connection. In short this whole speech is a fabrication of imagination and is a weak attempt to reinforce a weak theory. It reminds me of Al Gore's ramblings.