Sky News 
Carbon capture is a key part of the road to net zero carbon emissions, but many have tried and failed get projects off the ground.
Not everyone is convinced carbon capture will happen without a commercial incentive, but a greener future gets harder and harder without it
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/skynews
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/skynews
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/skynews
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/skynews
For more content go to http://news.sky.com and download our apps:
Apple: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-news/id316391924?mt=8
Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bskyb.skynews.android&hl=en_GB
Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí https://www.youtube.com/channel/skynewsespanol
source
About The Author
Climate lockdowns will be a thing mark my words
Who trusts these polluters?
They are only looking to charge for their right to pollute.
Net Zero "Much Harder" without carbon > Karl Marx
Stuff to saving the climate as its just another excuse to tax us more.
China without them this whole agenda is POINTLESS
This is all bollox my brewery uses 1.5 tons a week of C⁰2 in bottled beer, as people drink it it realest into the atmosphere so surely that needs to be stopped????????
Let the trees do their job!!
trees love co2..all this propaganda lining the billionaires pockets while the rest of us pay…idiocy
So explain how they say we put out 163 billion pounds of air pollution a year and earth can't handle it…
And they also give numbers of trees and how much they absorb a year…
3 trillion trees. At 48 pounds absorbed each.
Um. But that means trees take in more far more than we put out at even 1 trillion trees at 1 pound each… Hmm
But yeah. They use droughts in places where millions live that needed to steal water from other places before the industrial revolution as hundreds struggled to live in them because there was no water to start with…. To say global warming is getting worse. Like maybe millions where a few hundred struggled in the past taking water from where it naturally was is why.
The aqua duct that feeds California they didn't even think the water would make it to the new settlement cause they were scared it would all evaporate. Bet a lot does to.
Every region where they complain about drought has far more people now days and they have redirected a lot of water.
All this
As Earth is still warming from the last Ice Age.
Strange to how they give fossils from the same ground or ice that they use for samples a timeline that lines up with earths natural warming and cooling give or take several thousand years but with layers of stuff right next to those same fossils.
Now they completely ignore that earth has cycles of warming and cooling that are probably right on track as they say all global warming could be caused by humans. So then what caused it before humans had anything like today?
And then 163 billion pounds of air pollution that half the trees alone could handle not counting other natural processes. Compared to 5 quadrillion tons of air.
Air refers to the Earth's atmosphere, which is about 300 miles thick and weighs 5 quadrillion tons.
So if we put that same percentage of air to pollution in a container and have another with air but no pollution… The one with a fraction of a percent of pollution will warm noticably faster right…..
Also crazy how millions live in area that when the Ice does come back. If they are still there. What was it that scraped away everything and made mist valleys in america. Oh yeah glaciers that nothing can stop.
Um so why aren't they planning for that as they ignore the clear natural pattern of warming and cooling they tell us about. As they try to spread fear and blame.
They probably wonder how earth warms when all the math says it should be getting colder with trees taking in way more pollution than we and even earth puts out. Which they say is less than humans somehow.
But with 90 percent if the ocean unexplored. That's just a guess.
Crazy how humans can see numbers that say they aren't the cause for something and barely contribute if at all.
We will humor them tho and say we do 1 degree Celsius of temp rise among the degree C natural rise that happens anyway. Still got Earths natural warming that'll happen on about the same timescale anyway
So even if we were zero carbon. That wont stop it and it ends in freezing temps and an Ice covered world….
So even tho its a bad thing and numbers say they are lieing. Humans are so self centered that even disaster has to be our fault even within facts that say it wouldn't matter either way.