Sky News 
Critics are warning that the government’s net zero strategy is underfunded and consumers could end up footing the bill. But who should pay for net zero?
Chairman of the E3G think tank, Tom Burke, says ‘in some sense it’s all of our responsibility’, and if the government chooses “the right policies” taxpayers, consumers and businesses should partly pay.
But climate activist Mikaela Loach argues that the bill falls with the fossil fuel industry.
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos: http://www.youtube.com/skynews
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/skynews
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/skynews
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/skynews
For more content go to http://news.sky.com and download our apps:
Apple: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-news/id316391924?mt=8
Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bskyb.skynews.android&hl=en_GB
Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzG5BnqHO8oNlrPDW9CYJog
source
About The Author
The responsible for the net zero cost is net zero cost !
New Living Translation
Seeing their faith, Jesus said to the man, “Young man, your sins are forgiven.” Luke 5:20
Money?!!! what is this script ? money is a number on a computer screen its not real .Where are the so called elite taking humanity , obviously the virus is on purpose and created , this climate spin is part of something too . We are cattle everyone ! alot of us for the slaughter ,the rest penned up and under control .
Enough with the climate crap it's not getting support for your woke cause only pissing people off only post's by sky is either covid related or climate related. They are incapable of reporting on anything else and doing any real journalism.
Humanity
I said it years ago that this climate change nonsense will end up costing us. Never allow junk science and politics to merge.
As always, those least able to afford it.
We all are but industry needs to sell them at cost and the government give money to industry to do it. No profiteering!!
Who is responsible for the even higher cost of not going net zero?
🤡🎬
Censored from explaining away the MSM nonsense propaganda.
Well at least when the lights go out and your house turns into a freeze box this winter, we won't have to listen to climate justice snowflakes anymore. Dying from hypothermia isn't a particularly a quick way of passing though.
Make the spacefaring Billionares pay
These folks just don't know how hard it has been to get a 19 Kg Propane bottle to get a few months emergency cooking energy for this winters black outs.
Having to spend £2000 on emergency heating and lighting for this winters electricity blackouts is a pain, but its the worry of having nearly quarter of a ton of highly refined petrol chemical fuels on the property is what annoys me.
We all would do our bit to minimise the climate issues
Who bears the cost? Taxpayers and consumers, of course.
Ultimately, the people will pay for it regardless of who is responsible
Insulate Britain are responsible make them pay they are mostly middle class pensioners, stop their pension
Let me guess….
We're going to pay for it, and we still won't get to net-zero!
Who is responsible for the cost of going net zero?
The Syphilis ridden grubs lining up for kick backs ?
Joe publics tax bill, that’s who gets to pay for it. Meanwhile, bozo swans off each time he gets asked a question
We're going to be overjoyed at having to fork out at least £10k+ on heat pumps that barely work in winter, which is 9 months of the year up here in the North!
I wonder why they haven't told us the estimated monthly costs of running a heat pump all day, everyday, in the middle of winter yet? They're keeping that one quiet!
Of course, we'll be expected to power them from the solar panels we'll have to buy ourselves, powered by the 2 months of sunshine we get a year.
The green economy might work out down South, but up in the North, it's a total joke. Kind of like our Prime Minister, all promise and no substance.