April 4, 2025

21 thoughts on “Evidence says it’s ‘just impossible’ to reach net zero by 2050 without nuclear

  1. This is EXACTLY…. 100% TRUE FACTS. All other… SCIFI. This "date" at this rate of electric consumption is impossible to reach… Since we consume electronics as if it were water … since they do not want to use nuclear power, Gas "putin is bad", with water "the fish are disturbed", even with wind they "disturb the birds" .. . of course there remains the photovoltaic "which can only be installed above the buildings …." EXPLAIN ME WHERE THE HELL, BY 2050, WITH AN ANNUAL INCREASE IN ELECTRICITY REQUESTS, HOW WILL THEY DO ?????? But do you understand it or not ??? Would you be willing not to buy TV, MOBILE PHONES, WASHING MACHINES, AIR CONDITIONERS etc … ??? Only in this way, only by not consuming more electricity MAYBE WE WOULD DO IT … THEY ARE THE USUAL FANTASIES BUILT ONLY TO LET US LOOK ELSEWHERE … WHILE THE USUAL EARN MILLIONS …. WAKE UP. Only with nuclear energy, with the new plants that use waste several times, we could ONLY GET CLOSER TO THE OBJECTIVE …

  2. One insignificant very small problem? It's the most Deadly Waste know To Man' it take 2000 year's to Neutralize nuclear Waste" it's Deadly where ever you store it"
    Countries around the world Don't Want it….

  3. net zero is zero people, you can only get this by global extermination. CO2 does NOT cause global warming. Green house gases, i..e. water and CO2 do NOT cause global warming.

  4. I just wish more people trusted nuclear power. But I can totally understand why people are weary of it, we all saw what happened at Chernobyl and Fukushima. When it does go badly wrong at a nuclear power station, a constant stream of shit starts spraying through the proverbial fan…

    That being said, there are far better safety measures in 2021 than there was, say, 30 years ago. And Fukushima only happened because of the incoming tsunami.

    Nuclear power is safe, clean, and efficient. It's the only way forward imo.

  5. Ausralia will be talking about nuclear for at least another 20 years and then IF it is agreed upon it will take another 15 years to construct a few plants. Better start growing trees now to be ready to burn for energy in 20 years time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *