April 5, 2025

22 thoughts on “Governments around the globe have a new pet project – net zero emissions, what is it all about?

  1. Those kinds of cuts are not practical. Rush forward. That is the solution. New tech is the solution. But it won't come about by government spending itself into oblivion. It comes by means of free trade and business friendly environments.

    India should continue on its path like everyone else. Eventually it all clears up. Don't believe the alarmists. The problem will be solved and is being solved with new tech.

    No one is to blame. No one is a criminal in this. Human beings haven't been at this stuff for very long in the grand scheme. We're making strides

  2. Take out the word ‘net’ and you might have something. Offsetting carbon doesn’t address any pollutants other than carbon

    CO2 represents only about .04% of the atmosphere and human activity only accounts for variability in 25% of that. There is huge debate on whether carbon is our biggest issue in climate change but it will be very profitable for some. Climate change will likely be the next pandemic…with lockdowns, restrictions, special powers, etc, etc

  3. You're trying to decrease emissions, I'm going to increase emissions and make a lot of money, committed to saving money and economic benefits. Warming for me is just a three or five degrees increase in temperature, no direct impact So I chose cheaper products I sneer at environmentally friendly expensive products I'm even happy to see other countries being severely affected because it means they're going down. The value of taiwan is relatively high even without promotion

  4. Absolutely agree. I think climate change has been inflated dramatically for commercial exploitation but that historical pollution must be considered at all times. It will show the advancements that have been wasted by the west. Also it will keep in check these silly and stale theory based climate actions.

  5. Modi is correct. CO2 emissions are used up by plants and trees to nourish themselves, whence they release oxygen in return. There is no unused balance, a thing that has not been detetmined by science. Countries must not be deluded by the UN autocrats, who are corrupt. If the UN can stop China's pollution, then perhaps it will be credible.

  6. China did not attend, neither did Russia. They both smell a scam. Organized corporate green washing, with public money. Let each country accept Global air quality standards, and achieve that. California worked to reduce emissions, to reduce pollution, so can the world.

  7. If ya don’t eat your spinach ya can’t eat your meat
    I think every one is aware of the planet and the need to respect our resources but this climate cramfest is a lot of crap to swallow
    As they force feed people the more the resistance to swallow the spoon full of data
    If they really believe the meal is good then as they ( billionaires would show up to the table ) and eat like the the ones who they are force feeding we are all at the table of climate casserole.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *