April 6, 2025

27 thoughts on “How did India perform at #COP26? | Worldview with Suhasini Haidar

  1. However India has chosen 2070 instead of 2050,till then I think we have more time to make sustainable use and also we will have more energetic minds and dedicaters to cope with the situation more efficiently 👍❤ī¸

  2. The targets are still referred as prime ministers commitments. What is the contribution of each mp, mla or municipal council members. Can we plan interms of either a panchayat or tehsil or taluk, operating on solar energy during day time, only during summers

  3. Well India being an economic and milIitary super power does have the right to aim high. However Modi's hugging business is becoming irritating and more and more leaders are keeping a distance from him. They are accusing him of spreading covid-19. Modi should understand by now that this hugging diplomacy can only work in India or Gujarat not abroad. It is a low IQ AND LOW CASTE DIPLOMACY, which foreigners won't buy.

  4. As usual Suhasini’s topics of discussion each week are not just interesting topics for discussion but comes out with lots of important views on whose opinions matter ,a lot.Interview with Mr Rashid of Maldives was very relevant in view of countries affected due to rise in ocean levels . In the end her views of the books that matter to each subject of discussion would make interesting reading if one could lay ones hand on them.

  5. Thanks for the video. Just to clear the air at 7:00 . The commitment to end finacing coal power projects 'abroad' was a joint communique at G20 before Glasgow. India is very much a part of it. What India and China aren't a part of is stopping coal consumption 'domestically' which was agreed by over 40 countries in Glasgow

  6. Positivity is atleast we intention to achive by 2070 by the time even most present millennials will disappear. The negetive side is it is only a promise and most of the promises made by Indian politicians is simply an eyewash. Look at what was promised by present P.M during elections time and how many are achieved?

  7. Why should the developed countries who have contributed a lot of carbon emissions stop at net zero (which is actually, no adding further)? Who will take responsibility for the carbon emissions they have made in the past? They shld go beyond net zero to negative emissions i.e. they should take back the carbon emissions they have released in the past from the atmosphere.

  8. Why does COP fail. COP fails because it is setup to fail. What needs to be done to fix the problem? Immediately reduce fossil fuels and cut emissions to zero, end subsidies for fuels, pay the real cost of fuel, transfer the funds to renewable energy and pay damages for the most effected. This is a basic need to move forward. Because of the need for every leader to agree it takes just one leader to disagree to end the proposal or you need to green wash it to the lowest ambitious in the pack! This means you are always bringing agreements to the low bar, the low bar is always going to be nothing close to what is needed! That is why it fails! It has been setup too fail by people who want it to fail! You need too reach for the highest ambitions of the leaders who are prepared to do what is needed and implement those ambitions! A coalition of the real statesman! With the rest, you drag them along with incentives or sanctions! To consider this as a democratic process is a mistake. It is a moral choice of right or wrong! The question is that do you want to leave the most important action that mankind needs to take to leadership with the least ambitions? Because that's precisely what you're doing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *