April 4, 2025

41 thoughts on “How cattle impact climate change

  1. Hmmmm. So, poor cows are soooooo terrible. So, let's remove beef and change it with crops to feed people (crops require billions of tonnes of chemicals mined from the ground by buring diesel or other fuel, as lots of mines are not connected to electrical grids, and lots sof minerals are mined in developing countries. Then those chemicals are processed in factories, which have spills, waste, then those chemicals are sprayed on the soil, yep, that's all environmentally friendly). Or maybe let's remove beef with an artifical meat. Great idea again….. For big pharma, and big food concerns, as those will be only groups benefiting

  2. Cows & Bulls = Mature males weigh 450–1,800 kg (1,000–4,000 pounds) and females weigh 360–1,100 kg (800–2,400 pounds)
    The average Stegosaurus was about 30 feet long, between 9 and 13 feet tall, weighed about 5.5 tons (11,000 pounds).
    Methane would have also been produced by other herbivorous dinosaurs, most notably members of the Thyreophora (shield bearers), such as Stegosaurus.

  3. Cows are not adding new carbon to the atmosphere, they are simply part of a natural equilibrium. They fertilize and sustain the pasture on which they feed – this is the carbon store. They eat the grass, release methane… which is eventually re-absorbed by plants…and the process continues. Fossil fuels ARE adding new carbon to the atmosphere – carbon that has been locked away for millions of years and would otherwise not be in our atmosphere. When comparing the environmental impact of different farming methods, we need to look at the complete picture – not one part of it: transport, fertilizer production, water, heating, pesticide use etc..

  4. Cattle emissions do not have an accumulative effect like fossil fuels. For that reason there is no need to reduce cattle emissions as they reach a certain level and stabilise out.

  5. This is the stupidest agenda I have ever seen. Really. Leave cows and farmers alone. We need them. Surely government oversight can spend more time looking at industrial chimneys, oil and gas production, all exhaust systems of every transportation system around the earth.
    Many back woods countries still burn coal. Leave the poor farmers and their very innocent cows alone.

  6. Poor cow doesn’t realise the GHG comes from the vegetation regardless of if it’s in a cow or rotting / digesting on the ground .The only way to curb it is to stop plant growth and decomposition .

  7. Cows? Really? Humans contribute 60% of annual methane emissions, contributing to 25% of annual global warming! All we do is process carbs to produce methane. So why don't we eat less plant based and eat more animal based or low carb? Less plants and more animals. Whether we do or do not eat plants and just let the plants decay naturally, more plants = more methane. The holistic solution is to reduce plant growth worldwide, and for us humans to reduce our plant food consumption.

  8. We’re still believing carbon emissions from cow farts are going to bring about the apocalypse eh?

    It’s not about the climate. It’s about control. Those who control the food not only control the economy, but most importantly the people.

  9. There always talking that killing cows for meat is cruel but now because of there manure they want them gone but what do they want us to do just leave them on the side of the road choose one or the other

  10. Lmfao…..de-fund The CBC…they are to dumb to continue…..so I guess during the largest mass of animals during the dinosaur years that co2 emissions were astronomical.. what a joke. Stop with the bullcrap, besides cattle do a lot for the environment, their waste is a all natural fertilizer not chemical crap that destroys the soil…..

  11. We will eat bugs while China builds a new coal fired power plant every week for the energy to build our green economy. Wake up people, the BS climate movement is just communism rebranded.

  12. Scientists: "Gases from cow dung and flatulence causes climate change".

    Also scientists: "Biogas is green energy"

    😂😂😂 what's wrong with 21st century science?

  13. Canada and USA have about 50 million cattle between them in 100 there were about 80 million bulfalo in north america so since 1800 that is onl about 62% of the large ruminents on the content!

  14. Cattle are an important part of the cycle. They create the fertilizer that we desperately need to grow food right now. The ocean is in roughly the same level as a hundred years ago, but right now we have food shortages, and an economic crisis in part due to the replacement of fossil fuel vehicles, with vehicles that store fossil fuel energy in a dangerous toxic battery, that supports a foreign economy, who pollute like Hell. We still have Polar Bears. They didn't all get stranded on an ice cube for a photo opportunity. The latest fundamental resource the Globalists wish to regulate is sand. We are not running out of freaking sand!. Concrete is not killing the planet. It's a cheap effective building material, that people can make themselves. It can be used for culverts and aqueducts to restore an area. It can be used to build a cistern in order to conserve water. The goverment and corporations pollute. They blame it on the people, punish them with a tax they use to do more polluting.

  15. Electric cars are heavier and require more energy to move. Do you have an off grid energy farm at your house? They are charging off the same primarily fossil fuel grid. You have to be low i.q. to believe electric cars are the answer to transportation, and high i.q. evil tyrant to put the squeeze on so many hard working people.

  16. This is pure stupidity, just to let you know literally every animal farts methane, if methane was a problem then the world would’ve likely burned centuries ago.

    I don’t know about you but I feel that for a more recent problem, it’s likely caused by a more recent development

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *