April 6, 2025

22 thoughts on “Will Biden Use Ohio Disaster to Declare Climate ‘Emergency’? | Trailer | Over the Target

  1. 🔵 Watch the Full Episode 👉🏻 https://ept.ms/ClimateLockdowns-OT

    ⭕SUBSCRIBE to the EPOCHTV YouTube channel TODAY: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr9eziCDBtDANyWguKLr4vg?Sub_confirmation=1

    🔴Check out 'The Real Story of January 6' documentary DVD here: https://ept.ms/3cxGVEO, use promo code “EpochTV” for 20% off!

    🔴 "The Shadow State," a feature documentary by The Epoch Times, takes a deep dive inside the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) industry. ORDER DVD: https://ept.ms/3XxcWir

    🔵 Watch more:
    https://www.epochtv.com

  2. Of course he will. CNN was already blaming it on Ohio. Even though there were three train derailments in a short amount of time in Ohio and they were still caring chemicals on a train. Though those who know no they did this for another reason also. I've got three plastic factories not that far away from my home. They want to act like the chemicals or the plants cause environmental damage all by themselves. People have been working at these factories for 20-30 years and they are healthy. I don't live in a big town but we have a lot of ant farms all around. The plastic company right down the street from me has a beautiful pond that geese and ducks are always on. They have beautiful that never looked at even when other trees dead. They have a beautiful gardens. I might add that the Ohio river is very close with woods and walking tails. There is massive amounts of wildlife i and you see something new every time you take a look. They live all around the factories. We've actually got way too much wildlife. Not one of the farms having an issue with factories being right next to them. We have three plastics facilities right in the same area. Two of which make plastic pellets that gets sent out to other companies who make things like bottles. They have the chemicals they have never had an incident. Though they will take every damn advantage to blame the chemicals and the factories rather than what actually happened. Isn't it interesting that the manufacturing plant exploded also? Isn't it weird how Ohio was trying to secure people's retirement and make even less strict gun laws. Yeah go look why there might actually be a conspiracy here. Several other than the great opportunity to act like Ohio is destroying their own environment. The factories in the people are not the ones who released the chemicals like they did nor the ones who were carrying that crap on a train. Seeing how it is the worst form of transportation. Even if they want to deny it…. Even if they caused it. 3 train derailments in a row says something's kind of odd here. Ohioans need to fight back. This had nothing to do with what Ohio did any more than Florida cost it's so damn hurricane. Also the fact that the federal government and others who were actually at fault for this don't and didn't even want to clean it up. With all their environmental mumbo-jumbo that they're pushing that should have been the first thing you thought they would have done. Seeing how Ohio and Pennsylvania weren't the only ones at risk. People might think of us is small-town clueless folks…. We are not. We are one of these states that make the rest of them work.

  3. No need. Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. The IPCC reports in AR6, chapter 11, "The total global frequency of TC [tropical cyclone] formation will decrease or remain unchanged with increasing global warming (medium confidence)." Not that I really care about what the IPCC says. Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence).

    The Global Land Precipitation Anomaly from AR5 will disappoint with deviations from the average increasing by 0.2% per decade, but if you look at the actual data, it's just very variable over the decades.

    Drought appears to be decreasing globally (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017.

    For every million people on earth, annual deaths from climate-related causes (extreme temperature, drought, flood, storms, wildfires) declined 98%–from an average of 247 per year during the 1920s to 2.5 in per year during the 2010s.

    Data on disaster deaths come from (EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain, Brussels,Belgium. )

    Globally 2000-2019 there was a large decrease in cold-related deaths and a moderate increase in heat-related deaths (Zhao, 2021, Lancet). However, coldwaves are over 9 times more likely to kill than heatwaves, so the overall result is very beneficial.

    What else? Oh, deserts like the Sahara have shrunk considerably since the 1980's and the Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime (NASA).

    The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover has reached the greatest extent ever recorded.

    On extinction the rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. Of course, extinction is a natural part of the evolution of life on this planet with the average lifespan of a species thought to be about 1 million years. It is estimated that 99.9% of all plant and animal species that have existed have gone extinct.

    There is no climate crisis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *