April 5, 2025

45 thoughts on “Is the Magnetosphere CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE??? #shorts

  1. Climate Change is Melting Ice on Land, it's weight over the Area of Siberia, Greenland, Antarctic is Releases Weight from Planets Crustal Layer, the Crust will Rebound when weight is released, will that allow enough "play" between Core & Mantle & Crust to have our Magnetic Pole Flip in Core..?

  2. It's galactic cosmic rays people! They produce clouds that trap heat. Or that block it. I can't remember which. Either way… clouds haven't been studied enough, their type and amount are not monitored carefully so… they could be a large part of any warming we're seeing.

  3. It doesn't matter how deep you dig, or how strongly you debunk this BS denialism "theory." The "Let's Watch the World Burn" club will never admit that climate change is real, even as they are sipping the last drop out of the Mississippi River through a straw.

  4. Water will rotate from an electrical charge. No its not case closed.
    The northern lights are an obvious atmospheric response to the sun and earth fields. It doesn't end with pretty lights.

  5. Blacksmiths gague the temperature of steel by using a magnet. Over a certain temp, iron loses its magnetic capacity. If the Earths core is iron, which is speculation, at the core temperature it would be above magnetic capacity. So we really don't know how we have a magnetosphere.

  6. Iron ore was naturally placed on the crust during the time when the planet was growing. Over time layer after layer left huge deposits put there by nature for a reason. Man removes ore, makes steel and builds cities that affect magnetic field. Just a theory.

  7. But @PBSTerra where are the earth’s magnetic poles moving? Yes the weakening magnetosphere is caused by the pole excursions. – but what is causing our poles to move?

  8. A theory is based on observable facts and experimentation that can be repeated. A Half-Baked "hypothesis" is someone claiming the magnetosphere is affecting something it can't physically affect. Why do SO MANY PEOPLE use the word "theory" COMPLETELY WRONG!!!!!

  9. Is it possible that the large amount of copper and iron that we use for construction of dense high rise cities, affect the magnetic fields, due to the large concentration of the materials in one area, instead of being spread through out the earths crust?

  10. There is none huh, you've been told well never to look directly at it.
    But please don't disregard the sun like that. We all know that earth lives in cycles and ours is about to end.
    Pole shifting, climate changing, massive flooding, micronova poof humanity is toast again.

  11. People really do love exercising their 3 braincells to find the stupidest refutation of human-induced climate change. Even a 5 year old could understand the concept of a dramatic change of rate of increase in temperature and CO2.

  12. All the information freely available states that «the magnetic field protects our planet from cosmic radiation and from the charged particles emitted by our Sun»… If this does not interfere with climate change…

  13. Did she really say from the dinosaurs to humans without any significant changes in weather.
    We have these things called ice ages.
    We are living in an interglacial period.
    The planet is mostly in a glacial state.
    And no, the magnetosphere does not affect climate.
    The ongoing magnetic excursion in which the Northern magnetic pole was once traveling 10 km per year is now traveling 40 km per year.
    Plus the fact the magnetosphere is weakening also at a faster rate, is more concerning than any weather related problem.
    Studies have found that pole flip means an entire collapse of the magnetosphere.
    But only for a brief period of 200 years.
    There would be no way to live in an electrical world without a magnetosphere.
    One mild CME would shut down the grid.
    And it would make no difference whether something electrical was on or off.

  14. https://climate.nasa.gov/explore/ask-nasa-climate/3104/flip-flop-why-variations-in-earths-magnetic-field-arent-causing-todays-climate-change/
    NASA is saying they are not causing todays climate change, they are not saying there is no measured/theorized change from it.
    Further down in their official statement on that, they do mention all the climate change found, it might in worst case be a Zeitgeist thing that they're trying to save the world and be slightly less than honest and using dialectic to make a moral point while still trying to be informative and not lie.
    As you can see in the last sentences, they are trying to make out a per mille to per cent range of energy difference, be nothing.

  15. The primary impact would be with a technology that wasn’t around for 299,700 or so of those years. Electricity. Basically a weak magnetosphere can’t protect our grid so let’s see where that goes by 2025. Personally I hope I’m wrong as I like my A/C 😊

  16. The earth is being bombarded by microwaves a such from the sun.
    As the magnetosphere decreases the harder we are his by solar radiation and the warmer earth gets.
    NASA has known this for years but you can’t tax the sun so they blame us.
    Temperature is causing the rise in CO2 because the rise in CO2 lags the rise in temperature. Cause and effect proof 101.
    You are a propagandist for the WEF!

  17. I just want to say that I absolutely love your content. I am a doctoral student in clinical psychology. Your work is making such a contribution to our movement. You probably will never read this but keep it up and keep doing what you are doing.

  18. The magnetosphere is WHY we have an atmosphere.
    The magnetic poles ARE SHIFTING.
    The magnetosphere- THE substrate of ALL weather- IS NO LONGER THE CORRECT SHAPE.
    YES.
    CLIMATE IS DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY THE PATTERNS ESTABLISHED IN THE ATMOSPHERE.
    ….don't listen to this lady. She is WRONG.

  19. Rome's Portus grain port 200 AD at sea level, now up to 40 metres above sea level, is obviously not silted over, as NASA proclaims, attached, because it's visible on Google maps and satellite. Google maps indicate a current elevation about 40 metres above current sea levels. 

    YouTube Drain the Oceans Rome pictures the evidence. It's the tip of the iceberg. There's a huge community of marine archeology studying sea levels fluctuations. Mostly below sea levels but some above. Apparently one researcher sought permission to scan the flood plains below Troy. 

    Apparently there are hundreds of ports from the Roman era which are now above sea levels. Isle of Thanet, Shore Forts, Port of Rye UK. It appears the conventional explanation is "SILTED OVER" but new evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, is sea levels were higher in Roman times. Rebuilding global ports needs 100 years lead time ( check with Arcadis, Netherlands) and because we're talking about the End of Civilization, this issue is STAT.

    Scientists who debated a physical environment without inspecting it are like Ancient Greek scientists who debated how many teeth a horse has without inspecting horses.

    It's urgent that marine archeology, inSAR, NISAR, Adrok Scotland ( AI and big data radar points) and ground penetrating radar ( a new technology), geomatics ( a new science of ground instability or movement), mining tech, volcanology, ash layers, and so on re-examine the physical evidence because civilizations built on ports end when their ports are high and dry or submerged. Don't know whether sea levels will return to their (recent) peak in 10, 100 or 1,000 years, nor what the cyclical processes are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *