April 8, 2025

28 thoughts on “‘Fantasy’: Net zero emissions by 2030 is a ‘danger’ to Australia

  1. When I was a kid in the 18th century. If someone said to me we are going to demonize the world for being 1 degree hotter in the 21st century I would have said, ONE FUKEN DEGREE????

  2. They will have to get a permit to dig a hole for the First Nation people right or doesn’t it count as it’s not farm land, what a mess

  3. net zero is very good thing .. shut down every thing now. shut all things down ban all power stop ban cars trucks planes.. live in the cold and dark.. cold is good for fools.. cold kills fools

  4. Net Zero at all is a danger to plant life, as plants require CO2 to convert, and if we are at Net Zero, plant life can not be supported.

    Human being are carbon based.
    What do you think Net Zero really means?

    The genocide of humanity.

    "It's in everyone's best interests to avert such an end…"

    Is it? 'Everyone'? How about satan?

    That's right.

    They made you forget who you are and how you became to be the way you are (noble, honorable, generous, compassionate, selfless, humble, etc. God-fearing nation), by seperating the West from our Christian faiths.

    Satan hides in darkness, and when removed from Christianity, men of the West dwell in darkness.

    Intelligent design.

  5. Net Zero is a scam… There is no climate emergency… They want to send us all bankrupt so they can say we need a Great Reset with new digital currency and we will all need a digital ID to use it… Then we will be screwed.

  6. It's a double edged sword. On one hand we are decentralizing power generation which will counter attacks on the power grid, while on the other hand we are shifting the energy supply chain control over to China because the west currently lacks the ability to mass produce batteries and solar panels at scales required to power continents. Seems like a massive security risk that Australian energy and its expansion will be controlled by foreign powers if net zero does take hold by 2030.

  7. <Sigh> Just more Sky News bullshit. Keith Pitt is anti anything progressive including fuel. Fortunately there is work underway to debunk dodgy science and people putting forward myths as facts. I can't wait for the latter to hit this website. Oh yeaaaahhh!

  8. Looking at them wind farms, I'm just watching outback truckers delivering all the parts to make these windfarms. Kind of ironic they want net zero, And putting up these windfarms, Which need huge diesel trucks to transport the parts. HILARIOUS.

  9. Good news today Peta – Norway goes on oil & gas spree and gives its blessing to projects worth over $18.5 billion 👍 – Common sense is starting to break out!!!

  10. We have billionaires owning large shares of energy companies with vested interests in renewables using shareholder voting to shut down coal power stations so they can profit from renewables and nobody is highlighting it or doing anything about it.
    Those that voted for the shut down of Liddell have capital or contracts that will lead to a financial benefit from the shut down.
    This surely constitutes some sort of market manipulation?
    And at the expense of consumer I must say.

  11. What happens at 2030 though are we still planning to offshore carbon intensive coal to other countries after the honeymoon phase of carbon neutrality has starved everyone blind.. forget how much of a carbon offset war is as well dont look at those stats..

  12. We are already at net zero emissions… for our population, emissions and even exports, given our natural environmental sequestration in this great land we are already there…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *