April 8, 2025

15 thoughts on “Net Zero agreement has led to conversations about nuclear and ‘new technologies’

  1. Now the coalition is in opposition they want us to build nukes. Did they want to build nukes? Of course not. Don't be stupid. They cost too much and no one wants them anywhere near them.

  2. Australia has an oversupply of the sun and uranium yet we're focussing on windmills and waterfalls for energy production
    We're a nation of imbeciles if we don't move to nuclear sooner rather than later

  3. All it was, was political virtue signalling… With China and India ramping up building MORE coal power plants, there is literally no incentive to shoot ourselves in the foot with intermittent "green" energy 😂

  4. It would take Australia 25 years to build a nuclear power station,and thats after its approved. Just look at Snowy Hydro 2.0, 10+ billion dollars over budget and 8 years overdue (so far). We'd all be using candles and cooking over wood fires if we had to build anything to get electricity.

  5. Screw net zero, CO² is plant food, carbon is the fundamental building block of life, make no mistake the carbon they want get rid of is you, that's why labor won't even seriously consider nuclear energy and instead went hell bent for leather down the unreliables road to self destruction

  6. It would be great if science was taught in schools again. We learned power grid supply in grade school in the 60’s. By high school kids should know that nuclear power has changed dramatically since Chernobyl and 3 mile island.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *