April 8, 2025

28 thoughts on “Political debate around climate change and net zero to be revived with PM visit to Hunter Valley

  1. Pure insanity to hand over Australia energy independence to China. China owns all the "green" minerals and will turn off the switch to Australia and the western world for the slightest provocation.
    All a money laundering back door scam to enrich the globalists. 💰💰💰💰💰

  2. Fact– The two new coal mines Winchester south and Vulcan south will generate more emissions than the whole of Australia does. When you look at total emissions generated by population Australia is the dirtiest country by far and the fun thing is all the profit goes overseas.

  3. Also is usless! Yes finally sinks in his head the nuclear power, how many years will take? To pass it on?? We still need the coal! You idiots! How do these usless idiots produce still? With renewable? They don't even know what renewable means or is?😅😂😂👺👿👹🤡🤡

  4. To bring in digital identification to ration electricity use via smart meters. In South Africa, only 4 hours of electricity use to control the population! WEF and their net zero!

  5. Net Zero, is a pipe dream that is impossible to accomplish. When will Albosleezy learn that this is stupid and a waste of taxpayer dollars? Fix the coal plants and look at nuclear power for the future like the coalition says, we also need to bring our refineries back online but first they need cleaning up. I was a security guard at a refinery and we spend a ton of money keeping people off the land because they are riddled with asbestos and the public doesn't know what they are living next to.

  6. People who take climate change seriously are making new discoveries and creating new technologies. On the renewables front, it turns out vertical solar panels are more efficient (especially in hot climates like Australia). On the nuclear front, molten salt nuclear reactors eliminate the possibly of nuclear meltdown and produce far less problematic nuclear waste. In other words, molten salt reactors can be situated within or next to major cities, eliminating the need for long distance transmission lines. Now might be a good time to consider all the available options and bring an end to the partisan culture war on climate change and energy? That's if Aussies want more affordable electricity and fewer blackouts. Otherwise, just keep arguing about whether or not climate change is a thing so other less socially divided countries can put Australia to shame.

  7. Mount St. Helen volcano erupted decades ago. It unleashed more greenhouse gasses in one eruption than the full output of humans since the industrial age. NATURE recovered WITHOUT human interference.

  8. We have tonnes of Uranium, trillions of gas reserves, why the heck are we destroying farming land and trees for solar and wind, which have to be replaced ever 10 to 15 years. And what to do with all that toxic waste?

  9. Covering hundreds of hectares of food production land in solar panels (which are not recyclable and have some very dangerous components btw) to force the entire country to go electric, does he remember how expensive power bills are? Why are they just ignoring the obvious? Zero emissions is just NOT POSSIBLE! Why dont we go back to horse and cart, get rid of all the tech, phones, pcs, everything…THEN MAYBE it might make some difference in 50 yrs..

  10. Covering hundreds of hectares of food production land in solar panels (which are not recyclable and have some very dangerous components btw) to force the entire country to go electric, does he remember how expensive power bills are? Why are they just ignoring the obvious? Zero emissions is just NOT POSSIBLE! Why dont we go back to horse and cart, get rid of all the tech, phones, pcs, everything…THEN MAYBE it might make some difference in 50 yrs..face-blue-wide-eyes

  11. Covering hundreds of hectares of food production land in solar panels (which are not recyclable and have some very dangerous components btw) to force the entire country to go electric, does he remember how expensive power bills are? Why are they just ignoring the obvious? Zero emissions is just NOT POSSIBLE! Why dont we go back to horse and cart, get rid of all the tech, phones, pcs, everything…THEN MAYBE it might make some difference in 50 yrs..face-blue-wide-eyes

  12. Every thing on this planet needs carbon to be alive and be brought into existence. Including animals and plants they need it to grow and exist. Carbon is not a pollutant it is a necessity as it feeds mother nature.

  13. Wind & solar cheapest clean tech BY FAR. I'm thinking nuclear not for energy but part of military plans as govs around the world spenf more & more on arming themselves. The West have spent decades buying stuff from all sorts of repressive govs making them extremely powerful – like China & Russia – and now they're messing with global security. So instead of being able to expand social support services (healthcare, education, affordable housing, clean & cheap energy, income generation opportunities for all, great urban centres for all, enviro protection, etc etc), more & more is being spent on the military. Do ordinary folk even count any more, or are we merely worker drones & soldiers for empire building? It's 2024, all our social issues should be sorted by now… instead we've reverted back to the cold war era.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *