April 6, 2025

26 thoughts on “Net-zero transition has to be ‘balanced’ against cost to households and economy

  1. High ambitions which we the long suffering tax payers will fund through subsidies ,rising power costs,higher taxes. I have high ambitions that every single net zero nitwit will lose their seat

  2. As Andrew Bolt says: when Birmingham starts talking, cover your ears, say lalalala and walk quickly in the other direction. Hes a wishy washy, fence sitting snake that cannot be trusted. Its politicians like him that can keep parties in opposition for a long, long time. We cant afford anymore labor.

  3. How can renewables be going green when lots of carbon emissions gets pumped into the Atmosphere to manufacture millions of thoughs renewables. It defeats the purpose of cutting coal. And in 20 year's all has to be replaced. How did this pass the Paris agreement off going green?

  4. It's Just a Fact that the Coalition did Not do Enough of the Right Things with the Detail of Australia's Economy.
    Hence Our Capability to Capture Huge Australian Energy Progress is Not what it should be.

    Further,
    Senator Birmingham be Aware Some of Us Will make the "Tough Decision" and Shut Down Uranium Mining in South Australia.
    So Absolutely We Should Discuss Nuclear.

  5. Tom is a lefty absolutely and doesn’t ask the hard questions of Labor who are crooks . The Libs need to walk away from the Paris agreement ,as Net zero is fantasy and both sides of politics know this. These muppets are working for the WEF masters and need to get rid of 75 % of our corrupt politicians.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *