April 6, 2025

37 thoughts on “Concrete made from sugarcane could help fight climate change

  1. As per usual, the commentary is less than insightful or useful. It's bad enough the format of the story is simplistic but the commentary shows a complete lack of understanding of any issues. Ancient mud bricks used straw as a binder. With sun drying these bricks still form the ancient foundations of ruins in places like Mesopotamia (Iraq/Kuwait). This isn't a high tech material but useful for local small low rise builds to keep money in the local economy and to provide local building material and enterprise. Modern steel reinforced concrete uses steel, even though it rusts, because it has the same expansion and contraction rate as the concrete. In the west, CO2 injection into concrete make harder concrete through the formation of calcium carbonate. A fast look has this material having 2.5 times the compressive strength of hempcrete bricks. Uses an available byproduct. The other materials other than bagasse, seem to be lime, clay, sand, water and calcium carbonate.

  2. So massive monoculture of sugar cane is good for the environment? Good one. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Agricultural monoculture is one of the most destructive practices on the planet. The stupidity of these people.

  3. Or we could introduce limestone pebbles into cement. Just as strong as this idea and when the concrete cracks the limestone fills the cracks back in. Centuries old method – But then again, none of this is about saving the planet, it’s all about money.

  4. My question is, is it Vernon resistant, fire resistant and strong in high wind conditions, also do you need to install a metal or timber frame so as to pitch the roofing frame, and what about the plumbing and electrical installation, how would you install them in the walls

  5. ❤ Sugarcrete. Cuba's going to be rockin' with this new tech.

    Lets stop pulverizing our non-renewable Himalayas into concrete. Maybe the Indians will finally leave Nepal with their 200 cement companies: they are turning our sacred mountains into dust, drying up the monsoon and turning the entire subcontinent into a desert. Of course, Modi needs to stop tarmacking the subcontinent too. They plan to tarmac 22 million miles as "roads" by 2030 (if I remember the ADB report correctly.) The Asphalt Army is feeling very ambitious.

  6. Very interesting, similar to Hempcrete.
    One question, can it be used in earthquake prone areas?
    Old constructions in my home country were made with a mix of mud and natural fibers. Earthquakes destroyed all that!

  7. I hate the media. All they do is sell fear. There isn't anything new about fibrous brick. They "discovered" what people have been doing for thousands of years. So, a solution is for people who live close to sugar cane will be encouraged to use mud bricks instead of cement. We've addressed a climate change issue? Yet there is one car in Mexico, I see each day, that spews out more crap than building a dozen houses with straw will save. You haven't solved crap.

  8. Does sugarcrete provide the hvac and insulation dividends similar to that of hempcrete already being used in parts of the US?

    Same question in regards to whether or not sugarcrete is more flame retardant, fire proof?

  9. Most certainly not scalable. Global cement production is 4Gton per year. When mixed in with sand, rocks and water the weight reaches about 25 Gton per year. Global wugar cane production is 1.8Gton per year, after extracting sugar and drying it remains 0.2Gton.

    So it can roughly replace order 1-3 percent of existing concrete flux, assuming ALL of it gets used. There are alternative uses such as biochar. The type of reached conducted in this large "sustainability centers" are absolutely misinformed.

  10. I really like being positive but this one isn't so convincing. They conveniently forgot to mention the high risks involved in case of fire. It will be like living in a house made of hay.

  11. It sounds promising but this should go through more tests to ensure it can reliably replace concrete. Durability, weather resistance, cost, chemical weaknesses, etc. I don’t want this to replace concrete until these scientists have covered all their bases properly; I’d rather not see a news report covering a sugarcrete structure breaking down and getting tons of people hurt or killed because someone didn’t double check their work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *