April 11, 2025

23 thoughts on “Harry Wilkinson dissects Labour’s Net Zero Agenda

  1. The quicker the destruction, the sooner the realisation, hopefully.

    I've given up hope for a sensible direction of travel from anyone that's in government, or the official opposition.

  2. Many scientists believe that we need more CO2 to increase food production and that the "climate crisis" is a scam designed to create a food and energy shortage. No public debate is allowed on the subject, but "solutions" to the "problem" such as EV mandates, carbon capture, Paris agreement etc. are put forward to effectively hypnotize people into thinking the problem must exist. Almost all the World's leaders have fallen for this except Trump.

  3. If you vote for Labor because you hate the conservative platform, or maybe like Labor's social programs, you get net zero. If you vote for Conservatives for those other reasons, you get war. Or another thing you didn't vote for. The masters of the process have it all mapped out, what things they want, and which party is assigned to do them once in power. Actual promises don't factor in at all.

  4. This guy is not well informed enough to deal with govmts insane plans. We need someone much. More critical and numerate inthe idiotic proposals by. This govmt. They are insane and out of control .Doesn’t he realise the damage to be done. Miliband is a madman. What about battery backup. Do they talk to Paul Burges because they should.

  5. Miliband should be nowhere near government . He’s a career politician who has never had a real job in his life. He appears not to understand what it’s like to live in a real world as having enjoyed a a generous guaranteed salary paid for by the British tax payer.
    When he screws things up, real people’s lives will be affected whilst he will be un effected and walk away scott free.

  6. Stop saying Yuh No instead of ariculating your points clearly and confidently!!!! How can we trust you when you Blairspeak so unconvincingly?

  7. Where do we get solar panels from? Where do we get wind turbines from? China, in both cases. So we give lots of money to the Chinese government, they build them using coal fired furnaces, and they then export them by sea using tons of diesel every day. None of which are good for the environment, but make us look good, and they do not care what impact China has on the environment.

  8. Wind turbins need renewed every 12yrs max sea ones every 7yrs. Once fails carbon capture already at the fringes ready to replace. As if particles wont resurface repeat catch fresh air to tax u

  9. THE RISKS ARE SO GREAT IN NOT GRANTING EXPLORATION. cOMBINED WITH THE FACTUAL FOLLY SUPPORTED BY LOGIC AND ACTUAL EXPERIENCE ALREADY KNOWN THE COSTS OF WIND DO NOT STAND SCRUTINY . MILIBAND IS CLEARL;Y A IDEALOGICAL FANATIC WHO CANNOT SEE THE DISASTER HEADING OUR WAY WITH HIS RIDICULOUS FOLLY. mAQNY OF THE EXISTING OFF SHORE HAS NEVER BEEN CONNECTED AS TOO EXPENSIVE CONNECTORS. NO STORAGE IS ANOTHER FOLLY WHICH WE HAVE TO BUY THE UNUSED ELECTRICITY AND HAVE FOREIGN FUEL BACK UP . NON GREEN.

  10. If any world leader really wants to save the world, then they just need to release the Free Energy Patents, which have been hidden under National Security.

  11. Has anyone told these morons that the ''renewable" in renewables refers to the fact that solar panels and wind turbines need renewing every eight to ten years

  12. No such thing as Net Zero… It is about making money by lying to the people… So called green energy is not green at all… Nuclear power is the only form of energy that will ever go carbon negative , so called green energy never will go negative let alone break even…
    Also if you were serious about Net Zero you would not allow immigration as every human has a Carbon positive footprint. You would also not import goods due to the massive footprint compared to locally produced goods… Everyone that is pushing the Net Zero agenda is lying to you , from politicians to the MSM , U.N. , WEF etc. etc.

  13. Even it were achievable, it will not make one iota of difference to the overall picture. The only countries that could make any real difference, are not willing to do so. They will get richer while we will get poorer. We have some right barmpots running this country🙃

  14. All of this built on a lie that co2 causes the climate or temperatures to change which it does not. What difference id this money pit of an idea going to make except make the UK bankrupt. When you consider this one fact that no one tells you about. That 97% of all the co2 that goes into the atmosphere comes from the earth itself. Less than 3% comes from human activity . They say the UK's contribution is 1% , so that's 1% of 3% , which equates to 0.0003% . So ruin our economy , energy blackouts, people freezing in winter, all for a virtue signalling 0.0003% reduction in emissions of co2 which by the way are a nutrient for all plant life and not a toxic pollutant.

  15. crap politician ,crap leader and now he's a crap minster how bad does he need to before people realise he and most of the cabinet are worse than usless .Our little Island contributes a tiny amount toward the earths problems and Miliband will now add huge amounts with all the solar and wind generators being made in China thus helping pollute the Earth .Can we send him to China?

  16. CO2 = 1/2 of 1% of the atmosphere, Nitrogen = 95%. CO2 not a problem. Call it a problem and tax people for it. CO2 is not far off the critical tipping point downwards for loss of all planetary plant life, CO2 is needed it is not desirable to go NET ZERO. This 'Net Zero' crusade is being bundled along by bloody clueless idiots!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *