Sabine Hossenfelder 
Want to brush up your maths and science knowledge? Check out the courses on Brilliant. First 30 days are free and you’ll get 20% off the annual premium subscription when you use our link ➜ https://brilliant.org/sabine.
I suffered through an 80 mins lecture by Nobel Prize winner John F Clauser so that you don’t have to. He calls climate change a “myth” and insists that climate scientists are “dishonest” and “clueless.” It’s frankly embarrassing he goes on about this, as climate scientists have told him multiple times that it’s trivially wrong. I want to put this out there so that anyone who gets questions about it has an easy way to answer them.
You can watch the entire talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjoPBMtSxpU
Check out my new quiz app ➜ http://quizwithit.com/
Support me on Donorbox ➜ https://donorbox.org/swtg
Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ https://sciencewtg.substack.com/
Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ https://www.patreon.com/Sabine
Free weekly science newsletter ➜ https://sabinehossenfelder.com/newsletter/
Audio only podcast ➜ https://open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXlKnMPEUMEeKQYmYC
Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1yNl2E66ZzKApQdRuTQ4tw/join
On instagram ➜ https://www.instagram.com/sciencewtg/
#science #climatechange
source
About The Author
Sounds like a payoff to me.
Who said Germans don’t have a good sense of humor.
Politicians use global warming or cooling to control people and get money for themselves. 50 yrs ago we were going to die from global cooling, then it was global warming, now its climate change so whatever way it goes they are right. The government funding goes to those who agree with them. Check out James Tour and origin of life. Some people lie, researchers are no different. PMS was psychological 40 years ago. Cigarettes were given to people with lung problems. Check out Sabina's video, "My dream died now I'm here" – People lie for money.
they are incredibly dishonest as has been proven time and time again, but the so-called "climate change community" is like a women's sewing bee, full of jealousy and gossip, and now, it seems lots of lies. fighting and lying to get Gov't grants. your credibility is going in the dumper and none of you care because you think you are so much smarter than all the hoi-polloi
Clearly his intellect has dissolved long before his ego…
I'm hesitant to dog pile a Nobel prize winner. It's possible, (and likely) he understands the models and figures better than us propaganda swamped armchair scientists.
Not embarrassing.
Throwing an entire planet under the bus for profit. Humans suck and need to go away.
How much of an effect is there in removing particular matter from the atmosphere, that is to say pollution. Does it get trapped in the upper atmosphere or bounced back out, or has cleaning the atmosphere actually contributed to the global temperature increase?
Very poor Sabine
You sound hysterical. If you knew any good answer the governments would shut you up because they want carbon taxes so keep talking.
Many scientists can only be hired by governments and such government employees are not permitted to voice opposing views without risking loss of employment. Elon Musk will eventually install an orbiting solar shade to regulate solar intensity impacting the surface.
@mrosskne woah…
Thats a comprehensive compelling convincing well argued credible elaboration
You could be a guest lrcturer at ZuckBook university
The new grift: let’s attack renowned scientists with out of context excerpts so we look smart to the illiterates. Welcome to the grifter community of “professor dave” or “Dave McKeegan” to name a few!!!
You fail to mention that the ocean warming data is not included in the global warming agenda!
so sabine is admitting the Nobel prize means nothing to science! good stop using them as experts when you agree with them! simple!
'Carbon dioxide keeps our planet warm by trapping infra red energy..' really, Sabine?
I would be inclined to think scientists should stick to their own field for the most part, if they venture into other fields they do so carefully understanding that it is likely there will be a lot of people far more knowledgeable and more experienced than they.
14:34 sounded way more german than latin
Is it really embarrassing? Maybe you're an embarrassment
I am new to this site. I am not new to 'scientific theories' though. Scientists are always having to adjust their 'theories' when new scientific data is presented. I am absolutely 'floored' that this is the model that our current weather climate change is based upon. Remember that only a few hundred years ago, scientists had a theory, that they said showed, the sun revolved around the Earth.
Where is the OTHER scientific inputs into this model? Examples: the earth's changing point of axis (and therefore North and South pole positions i.e they move), the yearly irregularities of the distance from our sun as we orbit it, the sun's changing solar radiation output as it burns H2 and converts it to He and contracts and expands as the core is heated (i.e the amount of heat that changes our temperature. In the 1970's the weather forecast was we were all going to freeze), the fact that the Earth gathers 400 tons of mass every day from gravity caught space 'dust'.
The resulting increased pressure on the core of the Earth (creating heat) plus additional core heating, created by the natural slowing of our rotational spin (increasing pressure on the core), caused by the moons pull on our oceans (for the last 4.54 billion years), the heat transfer from magma flow that rises and ebbs to the underside of the crust and the heat dissipation into the Ocean, the heat generated by the volcanic venting into the air and thermal vents and the gases released by the volcanic activity. And I have probably missed a few like heat from the magnetic field and radiation waves from distant solar nebula's.
So the equation on the board, is so 'simple', it is a joke to even recognise it as any conceivable explanation for the world we see today.
I do not doubt that there is a 'weather pattern change' occurring at the moment. I do doubt, that the scientists have a real grasp of what is causing it though.
I have yet to see a plausible explanation, as to why the once grassy plains of Siberia, are starting to be revealed once more.
When the Mammoths walked the Earth, was that not a 'normal climate' back then? Perhaps we are in an 'abnormal period of climate' and just returning back to what was 'normal', before?
Are we 'fooling ourselves' if we are to believe that humans are in charge of the Earth and what the Earth does? Just cause we evolved with a smarter brain, does not make us the ruler of the Earth.
Sabine…..Thank you for being you!! I have learned much. Gracias. Especially thank you for all your research.
Unfortunately I think some people including some politicians will jump on this to deny climate change.i will await some YouTube videos to that effect assuming there is not already.
Why is it that such a high percentage of above avg. intelligent people r such narcissists? Is humility that hard to hang on to when u receive accolades for mental accomplishments?! This guy wins the Nobel prize in '22 n is so arrogant as to deny all of the changes that r happening! Tell u what, come on over here n move anywhere on the gulf coast or any of the poor n devastated 3rd world Caribbean islands who r under siege every hurricane season like never before.
. Only he knows the answer. His words.
Just listening to this guy talk it sounds as if he feels this subject is below him. Sorry but he's got that George w.bush heheh goin on!!!
I really like u!! Just discovered u, very educational and informative !! Thank u n keep it up!!!
Awww my grandpa was just like this. God bless.
If we are very good at measurement (questionable), we can see what is happening during the measurements. Predicting the future is the problem, there are many things we cannot forsee about the future and there are some things we don't even know about yet. Human behaviour, technology, geology, population, wars, etc can all have large effects that we cannot predict. Models that try to predict the future based on the past and currect measurements have many assumptions. Errors in these assumptions can cause large changes in model predictions. We won't know about those errors until later. The farther in the future you predict, the less accruate the models will be because of these assumptions and unknowns. It is good to do the best we can but we should not make drastic changes to our economy or liberty based on them because we have a non-zero chance of making things worse rather than better. Climate change is only one of the results of externalities of our lifestyle and too much emphasis on one result may make the others worse.
I think we should change our tax system from being income and sales based to one that is based on any externality at any phase of production. Since you get less of whatever you tax and we want income and sales, we should tax what we DON'T want: externalities caused by our activities. I can envision a tax at every level of production that is proportional to cost of the reversal of the externalities we cause. I think both sides of the isle would accept the change and I believe it would provide the best incentives for planetary conservation. It would provide powerful incentives to reduce externalities not only for the US but all the US trading partners as well. It would also be more fair because, unlike the current tax system, it would represent equal protection to all citizens under the law.
Phew, that bag of dry 82-year-old bones sounds almost asleep… so many pauses while he tries to gather his thoughts, or to force them across his tongue. And you suffered 80 minutes of that? Sabine, why do you do that to yourself?
I'm not a scientist but I've seen the data from the core sample samples from the polar regions, which to distil it down shows a repeating trend of cooling and warming that takes eons and has been going on well before we as a species walked the earth…
How the hell did this guy win a nobel prize? He SOUNDS like an idiot.
Well the leftists are to blame, if they had been honest and not engaged in a frankly shocking number of lies via cherry picked data almost all of those studies are paid "science" how it works is the say "this is the conclusion we want make the data work" and don't even try and say corruption is not rampant in the scientific community it has been on open display for last several decades and you all have LOST THE PUBLIC TRUST you towed the line when all data said otherwise and we all watched it in real time the real issue is not "people are stupid" its that you all allowed this to happen it ain't on them it's on you and your peers to restore that trust a very real issue with very real consequences. And btw from what I can tell it aint as bad as leftists say and more serious (potentialy) then the Right say and both pay for these "studies"
Just curious, what's the human's contribution of CO2 in total amount of this gas released into the atmosphere? Per cents?
Sabine is extremely talented and down to earth lady..
One of the great German lady who understands universe and beyond..
Very less people around the world understand what she says
Dear Sabine I am a solar radio astronomer who works with atmospheric researchers who fly high with LIDAR measuring condensation cores generated by gamma and x-ray so generating a reflective blanket of water droplets , since the massive start of the new main solar cycle with massive northern lights e.t.c not seen for generations and the massive drop in global temperatures the global warming theory of co2 is in our circles a joke. We have been laughed at for a few decades by the co2 zoo today we are the ones laughing global warming has nothing to do with man it's interlinked obviously with solar activity. That co2 is water solubleeven an idiot can see drinking sellters. The 0.04% in the atmosphere That has always Been is the concentration after scrubbing by water droplets ultimately ending in lime stone. We scientists knew their was something fishy when co2 credits were being traded on the stock exchange, ende der durchsage
I guess Dunning-Krueger applies to relatively smart people, too.
She is an amazing analyst. A female Einstein!
Ah I think he may have an entanglement issue between the right and left hemisphere of his human computing organ. It may have become over heated. But of course not due to climate change
The only proof I needed to know if he is right is provided by…YT!! Once again pointing with their misinformation ads what videos are worth to watch
I don't listen to IPCC or that Mr. Clause. Sick and tired of all the bs in "science" or what is called "science".