Channel 4 News 
Only yesterday the government was setting out yet more green initiatives.
But while pricey energy infrastructure projects may catch the eye – the evidence shows we should also be paying attention to something far more prosaic – mud.
Specifically, coastal mudflats, which are better at storing up carbon than forest, and which the UK is now the first country in the world to map.
(Subscribe: https://bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
———————–
Follow us:
Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/Channel4News/
Twitter – https://twitter.com/Channel4News
TikTok – https://www.tiktok.com/@c4news
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/channel4news/
source
About The Author
There is NO man made global warming, Its *ALL" bs
244Mt of carbon stored there — 13Mt added every year — thats a 20 year store, which implys that it recycles on a 20 year cycle, which does not make it a usefull sink surely ?, or have I heard it wrong ?
Leave our wash alone.
There is no Climate Crisis. The IPCC admit that if all of the COP directives and agreements were met it would change the temperature by 2100 by 1/10 of a degree. They know as any HONEST Scientist ,including Nobel Prize Winner John Clauser, that the Alarmism is totally unjustified,the Warming is natural.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE !! Educate yourselves … This CO2 alarmism is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE !!!! CO2 is the stuff of LIFE and CANNOT cause catastrophic climate change..
Atmospheric CO2 is almost at IR saturation and even doubling the amount would have a negligible change to the earths temperature. Just 20ppm accounts for 1/2 the current greenhouse effect of CO2 !
Weres the proof of global warming???or is it the 0.03 percent of carbon youre worried about 😂😂😂
What "climate change"would that be,then?
Take your pick from the last 70 years of predictions and they're all-;
WRONG!
Not buying what you're selling.
Is this the new brainwashing on this climate change garbage.
Well, show us the facts.
Well, what does this do to benefit us in the future?
And wind farms protect this. Surely nobody believes this.
At least the wind farms in the mud will not kill the whales and other marine life around it that has been proven.
Sheeple gullible I suppose.
Man-made since it used to extend to Cambridge!
No mention of windfarms disrupting bird migration!
Like other topics to do with climate change, this is not a new idea. Already some sea walls have been breached or removed and land returned to tidal flats. If we want eco solutions these are definitely the way to go. Nature will do the work if we let it. Its even given us plastic eating microbes already.
Don't they mean sand😊
Scientists say Channel 4 is scum.
"Climate change" is a lie in terms of man made. The graphs that are used to indicate it go back only to the Victorian era; completely ignoring the FACT that far higher levels of carbon dioxide – used in industry as a COOLANT, and to make plants GROW in greenhouses – have existed through many previous periods of history,PRE industrialisation. But you can't tell that to most people. Because they are thick. They do not work off epistemology. They work off what the media and people in a white coat tell them. The dumbness in the West is EMBARRASSING.
Oh shut up about climate change when they chem trail our skies
What climate change?
BS
#54&3 So 13 million tonnes per year 'sequestration' yet by comparison every Zero Carbon 3W'r that migrates north to join the Great Heat Hive adds 2 1/2 tons of CO2 a year (in US). Harris-Mayorkas 18,000,000 illegal aliens have added 45 MEGATONS of CO2 a year.! (Of course we're not allowed to state that)!
Nothing quite like it for cooling the blood.
Climate change biggest fraud in history
Yes another type of wetland is in fact important glad people are catching on.
"Kamala Harris joins Oprah Winfrey in emotional campaign event"
( news media) – sept 20 2024
versus:
"Wildfire engulfs Oprah's Maui Estate, homes of other Hollywood icons at risk too in Maui, Hawaii"
on the content:
"Maui wildfires destroy iconic restaurant owned by Mick Fleetwood and threatened Jeff Bezos, and Oprah Winfrey's properties but are reportedly safe."
( news media) august 11 2023
Tanggapan sekaligus menjadi pertanyaan:
Apakah dapat diartikan bahwa timbulnya tragedi 8 agustus tersebut sesungguhnya untuk melindungi kepentingan kelompok (keledai) 'penguasa'??
Karena seluruh masyarakat Maui yang memiliki ekonomi sederhana dan sangat sederhana tersebut tidak terlindungi sedikitpun dari tragedi yang terjadi pada 8 agustus 2023 tersebut.
Dapatkah para penipu itu menjawab??
—–
"Kamala Harris joins Oprah Winfrey in emotional campaign event"
( news media) – sept 20 2024
versus:
"Wildfire engulfs Oprah's Maui Estate, homes of other Hollywood icons at risk too in Maui, Hawaii"
on the content:
"Maui wildfires destroy iconic restaurant owned by Mick Fleetwood and threatened Jeff Bezos, and Oprah Winfrey's properties but are reportedly safe."
( news media) august 11 2023
A response as well as a question::
Can it be interpreted that the emergence of the August 8 tragedy was actually to protect the interests of the 'rulers'' (donkey) group??
Because the whole people of Maui who have a modest and very modest (poor) economy are not protected at all from the tragedy that occurred on August 8, 2023.
Can those barbaric 'donkey's' to answer??
Good news. Thanks for reporting about this. Let's hope this carbon sink is going to be protected