April 9, 2025

50 thoughts on “FIERCE CLASH đŸ”Ĩ Will Ed Miliband’s Net Zero Agenda DESTROY Britain!?

  1. It’s all a scam.CO2 is what the planet needs to sustain life.We are at the lowest levels in our lifetime.Research the facts and don’t trust their lies.

  2. Jobs created 4000 directly plus 50,000 indirectly, ‘WOW’ but what about the hundreds of thousands of jobs that will be lost due the high energy costs that this Net Zero Carbon capture nonsense will impose upon British industry. Who did the maths on that one Diane Abbott.

    This country achieving net zero is inconsequential in the bigger picture of things. It’s meaningless all that will happen is that we will be exporting tens of thousands of jobs to the likes of China and India. Countries who are now building hundreds of coal powered power stations. To produce the cheap energy required to manufacture goods to fill the void because of the inevitable demise of our manufacturing industries due to excruciatingly high energy costs. All because of our dumb-arse politicians from both sides of the political spectrum incessant drive towards achieving the impossible and totally unobtainable Net Zero target in such a short period of time.

    Net Zero is just a con a scam and an excuse for our politicians to raise taxes exponentially allowing them to boost their egos and look holier than thou at the annual WEF piss up in Davos, incidentally all paid for by the taxpayer.

  3. This guy, whoever he is, is the joke. Net zero and the green agenda is a total load of crap. Well said Darren, we are with you. The workers are already out of work, what is going to happen to them ?

  4. How could farming and steel production become irrelivant FFS.. This moron, with spouting his net Zero cobblers is along with his cronies an absolute danger to the well being of our once great nation… The sooner this net zero con is seen for what it is the better !!

  5. How can steel making ever become less relevant, and farming less relevant, Oh so we don't need UK produced food ? What is he going on about? Farmers are being punished by the green agenda.

  6. Let's not forget that when Labour hands out pay rises to the public sector, they are at the same time inflating the public sectors golden pension costs! Which the rest of us pay for before retiring on a pittance.

  7. Ask James Arthur (MILLIBAND) DOES HE BELIEVE IN THE SCIENCE!

    IN THE 70S 80S ET AL SCIENCE PREDICTED THAT WE WOULD HAVE ICEBERGS FLOATING IN THE THAMES IN 5 YEARS. NO ICEBERGS. NOW WE HAVE CLIMATE CHANGE IN 50 YEARS. SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER BEEN RIGHT BUT RECEIVE A GOOD WAGE. THE WORLD EVOLVES.

  8. Plant trees indigenous to the country/region, not building carbon catching machines.
    Clean out the water going back into the ocean.
    Trawler the floating trash in the ocean.
    As for energy, wind turbines are inefficient, and are subsidised. And the energy is expensive. It would make more sense to give businesses with flat roof buildings incentives to have solar panels on their buildings than destroying the countryside.
    Nuclear is safer now and it's stable, and cheaper.

  9. It's really about time those net zero nuts go live in space,the country could walk everywhere BUT untill you have china,russia,
    Pakistan,america and others doing the same thing as us in the uk the world is screwed and that's if the problem is as bad as the govt says BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THAT GOVTS LIE 😡

  10. Absolute crap. ÂŖ25bn over 20yrs is still ÂŖ1.25bn per year. They have spent ÂŖ5.6bn just on research over last 3 yrs on this nonsense. The co2 levels they are worried about are 400ppm. In the Cambrian period c02 levels were upto 4000ppm and life flourished and oceans didn’t boil. 😡😡😡 THIS IS OUR MONEY – how dare they spend it without even letting us as basic questionsâ€Ļ.

  11. Carbon capture is a load of rubbish. Quite simply because nobody really knows if it will work or simply be released in a few years. If you have to depend on subsidised money from the government then it's cobblers. If these government MP's were any good at predicting public trends they wouldn't work for the government.

  12. and still folk sit back and watch these morons reduce our power and natural resources to the point of real danger to our health/wealth and any kind of financial security this country might have had!!!

  13. I recall Milliband being schooled and embarrassed on tv whilst he waffled on about 'exploitative' employers. I cannot remember the host name but he recognised Milliband was a bit upset by it all and asked him if he needed some time out. I watched along thinking 'is this the best the Labour party has?'

  14. Will NET ZERO destroy The UK?

    Well I should hope so; otherwise all the efforts by The World Economic Forum to: dismantle its sovereignty; remove industrial capability; destroy energy independence; criple military capability… hence force global equity; as China and India level-up, ensuring in The UK the population levels-down, all the planning towards AGENDA2030 goals will have been wasted!

    In reality, the natural climate disturbance the world currently faces, requires maximising food production worldwide along with better food distribution networking towards areas where food production is reduced by climate issues.

    Legal mean of having mass migration and rapid preparation to absorb such people in cultures where they will fit in needs to have priority.

    What The UN; with nations leaders signing up to The Global Compact for Migration behind the backs of their populations, what this achieves is civil unrest… obviously a goal of the process.

    What The World Health Organisation; with the taking over of health responses to anything that might affect health globally, what this achieves is the rapid roll-out of interventions that are planned to possibly jave a benefit, but could cause an existential threat; since everyone will be experimented on under emergency use authorisation criterea.

    What The World Economic Forum; with its ability to censor opposition to planned AGENDAS (21 and 30 amongst others), is to control the narrative, whether what rhey plan is beneficial or harmful to any minority, or should they wish, harmful to the majority.

    Such supra-nationsl unelected bodies that are answerable to no-one, need to have their influence restricted and their objectives discussed openly, so they become controlled not the controllers. The public must have their say to maintain sensible guidance and not totalitarian governance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *