13 thoughts on “Richard Tice Slams Ed Miliband’s Net Zero Plan: A Disaster for UK Steel”
Just a quick look online, Trees play a vital role in the global carbon cycle by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in their tissues:
Carbon dioxide is food for trees
Trees use carbon dioxide as food, along with nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, to grow and thrive.
Trees store carbon
Trees store carbon in their trunks, stems, leaves, roots, and in the soil. A mature tree can absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year.
Trees release oxygen
As a by-product of removing carbon dioxide, trees release oxygen.
Forests act as a carbon sink
Forests absorb more carbon dioxide than they emit, creating a "carbon sink".
Trees can be used to offset greenhouse gas emissions
Trees can be planted on farms to improve land health and productivity, and to offset greenhouse gas emissions.
Tata is an Indian company. By the time we have an electric furnace there will be NO UK steel because Tata will have moved it to India. WTF are our so called leaders thinking!!!
Self evidently, windmills and sunboards cannot power a 100 trillion dollar global economy. Moreover, our planet is covered with trillions of tonnes of CO2 consuming, oxygen omitting, carbon based flora which thrives via the consumption of CO2 plant fertiliser.
NET – WHAT ??? NET ZERO DOES NOT EXIST !!!! WHO THE HELL DREAMT UP THIS NONSENSE ??? GOD CREATED THIS WORLD AND ITS WEATHER !!!! WE HAVE NO ABILITY TO CONTROL IT !!!!!!!!!!!!
Nothing said about doing away with fossilfuels and all related jobs. Engineering, materials not available and then the massive increase needed in electricity supplies like quadruple without fossil fuels. Intermittent elec then to be backed up with what. £ 30 trillion in batteries or nuclear power stations 50 needed for 2050
One thing this video hasn't questioned is has CO2 been proven beyond doubt its causing Climate change ? look at a few facts CO2 is 0.04% of the Atmosphere of this 0.04% only 3% is manmade so 97% is natural if you believe the theory (it is only a theory ) co2 is co2 manmade or natural theres over 30 times more natural CO2 than manmade so how do you know its the manmade CO2 causing climate change ?
Just a quick look online, Trees play a vital role in the global carbon cycle by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in their tissues:
Carbon dioxide is food for trees
Trees use carbon dioxide as food, along with nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, to grow and thrive.
Trees store carbon
Trees store carbon in their trunks, stems, leaves, roots, and in the soil. A mature tree can absorb more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year.
Trees release oxygen
As a by-product of removing carbon dioxide, trees release oxygen.
Forests act as a carbon sink
Forests absorb more carbon dioxide than they emit, creating a "carbon sink".
Trees can be used to offset greenhouse gas emissions
Trees can be planted on farms to improve land health and productivity, and to offset greenhouse gas emissions.
It's not a 'green' scheme; it's a red scheme.
These loon's are in the pay of red China and their superior's are heavily invested there.
Leave your Comments & Thoughts
Tata is an Indian company. By the time we have an electric furnace there will be NO UK steel because Tata will have moved it to India. WTF are our so called leaders thinking!!!
Coal is needed to produce steel to give it the carbon content for strength, it is not for the heat source.
Self evidently, windmills and sunboards cannot power a 100 trillion dollar global economy. Moreover, our planet is covered with trillions of tonnes of CO2 consuming, oxygen omitting, carbon based flora which thrives via the consumption of CO2 plant fertiliser.
NET – WHAT ??? NET ZERO DOES NOT EXIST !!!! WHO THE HELL DREAMT UP THIS NONSENSE ??? GOD CREATED THIS WORLD AND ITS WEATHER !!!! WE HAVE NO ABILITY TO CONTROL IT !!!!!!!!!!!!
They closed the pits, and now they're going after the steel industry. It's destruction from witin by the true enemy witin.
When was the last time co2 caused a climate crisis?
Count the number of "Climate" millionaires and it is clear why Net Zero is a policy. It not about carbon, it's about money.
Clim8 ch2nge is a Gaia religion funded by the State.
Nothing said about doing away with fossilfuels and all related jobs. Engineering, materials not available and then the massive increase needed in electricity supplies like quadruple without fossil fuels. Intermittent elec then to be backed up with what. £ 30 trillion in batteries or nuclear power stations 50 needed for 2050
One thing this video hasn't questioned is has CO2 been proven beyond doubt its causing Climate change ? look at a few facts CO2 is 0.04% of the Atmosphere of this 0.04% only 3% is manmade so 97% is natural if you believe the theory (it is only a theory ) co2 is co2 manmade or natural theres over 30 times more natural CO2 than manmade so how do you know its the manmade CO2 causing climate change ?