April 4, 2025

48 thoughts on ““Rachel Reeves Is Taking Us Back To The 1970s” | Labour Increases Tax On Care Sector and Farms

  1. Britain at this moment reminds be of a dwelling which has been run down for well over a decade, and with no interested buyers that are really interested, so the dwelling is put up for auction to hopefully find a buyer who want to first, take it back to brick and remove all non working parts and invest with new products to bring the dwelling back to the present day families requirements to live in once again. Much like we see in the programme "Homes Under The Hammer"

  2. The Conservatives never had a chance. NHS = Run by unions. Immigration = + run by union Civil service = unions. BREXIT destroyed by unions. Transport = unions. Boris= investigated by Labour Sue Grey

  3. Pretty sure the NI “Cut” was funded by- by fiscal drag! Cutting the main NI percentage rate (which is only payable up to a certain threshold – with everything over that threshold taxed at 2%) provided a fixed, annual reduction in tax whilst the effects of fiscal drag has dragged more people into either paying income tax or at higher rates, bringing the treasury more revenue even factoring in the NI reduction.

  4. The Care sector just cannot afford the increase in Corporate NI and increase in minimum wages. I am all for increasing the minimum wage but the fees must increase otherwise Care businesses will have to close and that will cost the government even more money.

  5. In my 77 years on this planet I have always been worse off under a Liebour government as a working man. Nothing has changed as a pensioner. My only consolation is all the dumb people who voted Liebour are also going to be worse off. One thing I am sure of is Liebour will be in the political wilderness for at least 20 years after the next election.

  6. The problem is that voting is not compulsory. There are a number of countries where if a person failed to vote they were fined. Some in Europe and others further afield. Maybe it ought to be compulsory/mandatory here in the UK. Then maybe we could get a better idea of exactly who the electorate really wants. Alternatively if less than 51% of the electorate vote the election has to be re-run.

  7. On the positive side it's good to see Reeves uses public services, a Library. Don't know how long see has The Ladybird book of "How to run the economy of a country" for, unfortunately she picked up the wrong one instead of Run it was Ruin. She probably uses it in conjunction with The Derek Trotter book "No income Tax, No VAT No money back No Guarantee"

  8. Why wasn’t anything mentioned in the budget about illegal immigration’s cost to the taxpayer,it’s not a trivial amount 10 million a day and probably a lot more in reality

  9. Ed Silliband wants all the Prime Agricultural Land (farms) for his Pylons, Solar farms and wind farms, so forcing farmers to sell their land, will mean the government can purchase them cheaply.
    We may not be food self-sufficient but at present we still have the farms to provide some of our food needs and the option to increase the productivity with the right financial help.

  10. No private sector, then there is no public sector at all.

    Attacking the private sector is as stupid as demolishing the foundations of your own house and having the expectation that your house will be fine

  11. I call a farmer inheritance relief charity charge to be placed on ALL food products that are sold in labour run constituencies.

    All shops should apply this them selves, since they too will be victims of the attack on farmers, the charge is to To protect the farmers from this envious Labour government and their supporters.

  12. Why on earth being the first black woman to lead the conservatives is a feather in the cap she's a woman a person elected to be the best but there just going to pedal the first black woman agenda all way to next election

  13. It is quite obvious that Reeves is a vindictive person. She has had a 'bee in her bonnet' about the fuel benefit paid to pensioners. She has always hated this benefit and that is why it was cancelled almost from the result of the election being known. The fact that Keir Starmer allowed it just speaks to the lack of 'political nous' demonstrated by the labour party. I am not a rich person but will never vote for the labour party. They are anti-business. You cannot make all of the poor people rich by trying to make all of the rich people poor. We now have £60,000pa train drivers with some older people being unable heat their homes. I wait to hear the labour parties excuses when the first old person dies due to lack of heating during this winter.
    We should cut members of parliaments allowances now!! I could go on and mentioned taking gifts to enhance their wardrobes but they disgust me and I don't want to even think of them any more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *