May 20, 2025

8 thoughts on “Net Zero Disaster: Small Nuclear Reactors, The Only Way?

  1. i couldn't agree more on green is a waste of time and money. Also, nuclear, modular especially, is the only way ahead. Are you serious about net zero? Then you're pro nuclear or lying or clueless.

  2. Farage telling his story to be modern taking us into, more money to pay out for the small modular nuclear reactors, has it even tried and tested, where did he get that idea.

  3. Long post – bear with me – ONE nuclear power station is the equivalent of 6700 wind turbines, has a lifespan of 60 years compared to just 15-20 of turbines, has a 90% efficiency compared to 25% of turbines, can work in all weathers…. unlike turbines that can't operate below 16mph or above 55mph windspeed and wait for it….. if that wasn't enough nuclear requires just 50 acres of land – how many acres does 6700 turbines need? Building a turbine at sea makes it THREE TIMES as expensive, and each sea turbine has a yearly running cost of 2-3 MILLION for maintenance. All this information is freely available to check. One final FACT – there have been less than 500 deaths and casualties from nuclear accidents in the entire 70 years they have been used, INCLUDING Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island and Windscale. Not 500 a year, 500 TOTAL. More people die each week worldwide from motor vehicles, but they aren't banned. There's an AGENDA BEHIND THIS HATRED OF NUCLEAR.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *