The Heartland Institute 
Is 1.5°C really a climate tipping point?
Not according to the data—or actual science. The popular threshold wasn’t determined by climate science, but by a political advisory group in the 1990s.
We’ve likely already passed it—no catastrophe in sight.
Watch Linnea Lueken explain.
📲 Get the facts at ClimateAtAGlance.com
#ClimateTippingPoint #1point5Degrees #ClimateScience
source
About The Author
i can not thank you enough for exposing truth. Please keep it going.
Dear video editor, did you watch beyond 2 minutes? Otherwise, great content.
Please never give up getting this great information out to all.
Science has been politicized. The research scientists are forced to choose between supporting the “science” of the politicians and getting government research grants or supporting independent scientific research and risk their careers.
Truth here!!!!!!
The climate change religion shows how superstitious some in the human family can be, PhD or not ….actual data is set aside in favour of strongly held emotive beliefs….
Pre industrial temperatures means after the end of the "Little Ice Age". In particular the Dalton Minimum. Any warming after that is a blessing but hey, never let reality get in the way of an authoritarian takeover.
If they only use thermometers in urban areas the rise is above 5* c or more and if all the UHIE sources are excluded the temp may not even be anywhere near 1* c
More CO2, MORE FOOD, PLANT LIFE, then cheaper fuel benefits because of less heating.
People need to have money so researchers come up with away to cause controversy then governments give money to find out but there is never a consensus
Anyone with any common sense knew this was a tax and power grab. It is so sad that we live with this many lemmings who will blindly follow anything their people say.
Follow the money
HEY stop speaking the scientific truth. You'll ruin the climate change industry !
It's hard to believe in a Democracy that there is so much propaganda about "climate change," but politicians with an agenda ignore science that opposes their agenda and instead pay off those scientists who support their agenda. In turn, these scientist invent pseuoscience to convince the public to believe the propaganda.
The "little Ice Age" only ended in 1850 after 500 years of actual, radical climate change. That's not even 200 yrs ago. Why wouldn't the atmosphere still be warming?
In the US, people in the Northern states save money for their entire lives so they can move to Florida before they die. They want to move to where it is 20 degrees C warmer in the winter, yet they are told to believe that if Buffalo warmed more than 1.5 degrees C it would be a disaster. It would actually be fantastic! The winters would be a little less extreme, and the risk of severe weather would be lower.
Warmer is better for everyone.
World leaders travel by private jet or commercial planes for a conference to discuss what to do about climate change. Why don't they hold their conferences via Zoom, if they are so concerned about the environment?
Fear mongering galore thanks to faltering & corrupt MSM!
The Medieval Warm Period was AT LEAST 1 degree Celsius WARMER than today, and the Roman Climate Optimum was even warmer… and at no time during the 11,000 years prior to the Industrial Age did atmospheric CO2 concentrations rise above 280ppm (today it is 427ppm). CO2 has NO IMPACT on planetary temperature AND>>> there will be NO TIPPING POINT!!!
Marry Me. 😀
When a former leader of the Greenpeace movement tells us we can do with more CO2 and that we are at the tale end of an interglacial warming period and we could do we'll to protect our planet from cooling so much crops fail, ya kinda know that it's all BS and that the legacy media are just peddling their lies as usual. Globalists can suck me off