April 5, 2025

23 thoughts on “Is Singapore doing enough for climate change? Here’s what DPM Lawrence Wong has to say.

  1. Countries become rich because they are innovative and on the forefront of technology disruptions. If they are last, they have to import that knowledge and end up last.

    This politician has too much focus on the short term. It will hurt Singapore in the long run.

  2. Boy, why are you not talking about background burning of garbage with all kinds of plastic and plastic bottles etc that are putting all gases that are harmful for environment. And we are not talking about hundreds of backyard fire but billions across Asia, China Russia and Eastern Europe and all over Africa. These can be avoided at a very little cost.

  3. climate change is just a political tool from the west to suppress China advancement. many here talked as though they know everything in this world.

    the term climate change is a naturally recurring phenomena (different from many people's context of man-made disaster, lul) of cyclical (superfluous) ice age.

  4. Climate change is a not proven. Moreover, whatever Singapore does will not make any difference in Singapore because it is too small. What Singapore is doing is just expensive PR ("virtue signalling") and another revenue generating scheme for the government.

  5. The guy asking the question about Singaporeans aware or not, is he a Singaporean ? If he is, he is pretty ignorant😅. If he is not he is expecting others to help 😂. Anyone helping Singapore especially financing 😢😢 ?

  6. The Indian student talk as if like he is so smart. Young is only a number. No point being young but not practical. Life haven't even begin yet for these youngsters. Does the young think that only they have the votes? of course not. Today's old is yesterday's young. People grow old. Fundamental thinking and value will change every 10 years. The disgusting traits about young people is that they thought they are very smart. When they step into society then, slowly they start to realised that those who looked the most harmless are actually the smartest and those who makes the most noise, looking like smartest are actually the empty brains.

  7. If young people are the smartest, why is it that it is always the young people that are doing the killing and getting killed in war? one can argue that because middle age and older people can't fight, as they are not strong. Well, No! if they can squeeze the trigger and fire a weapon and standby at their position, they can fight. Give a 60 years old uncle a machine gun and ask him to squeeze trigger he can't do it? He can ! He can do the killings too. So why it's always young one to go fight war, young one initiate change? because they are naive and restless. Older people are more experience and ignore emotions. Therefore, older people can use the naiveness and restlessness in young people and get them to do what they want… and let the young one feel they are smart.

  8. 0.1 percent of global emissions … all blinded by wokeness, we should do more do make life cheaper, start with electricity. Burn coal if electricity can be cheaper because nothing we do will impact what china, India, USA pollute, why must we suffer a high cost of living for no gain ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *