
Climate Change is a real and serious issue. In this video Bill Nye, the Science Guy, explains what causes climate change, how it affects our planet, why we need to act promptly to mitigate its effects, and how each of us can contribute to a solution.
➡ Subscribe: http://bit.ly/NatGeoSubscribe
➡ Get More 101 Videos: http://bit.ly/NatGeo101
About National Geographic’s 101 Series:
Explore and experience the forces that shape the world around us.
Get More National Geographic:
Official Site: http://bit.ly/NatGeoOfficialSite
Facebook: http://bit.ly/FBNatGeo
Twitter: http://bit.ly/NatGeoTwitter
Instagram: http://bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
About National Geographic:
National Geographic is the world’s premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what’s possible.
Climate Change 101 with Bill Nye | National Geographic
https://youtu.be/EtW2rrLHs08
National Geographic
https://www.youtube.com/natgeo
source
I certainly admire anyone's passion, to clean up the planet, but it seems, that as some people's passions grow….their brains shrink. As a Power Engineer for 42 years, here is what I know. Roughly 75% of our Electrical demand (Our Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc), that we take for granted, is supplied from Fossil Fuels. Roughly 25% comes from Nuclear Plants, Hydro Plants, Windmills & Solar Panels. Biden & Trudeau (for us Canadians), shutting down the Oil & Gas Industry, does NOT solve anything. If Fossil Fuels, still make up 75% of the supply, to fill the demand, if we're not drilling/processing the Oil & Gas……….the 75% of demand, has to come from somewhere, otherwise we'd all be sitting in the dark, with no Lights/Heat/Air Cond./Phones/Internet/etc….The fact is this: Biden & Trudeau are shutting down the Oil & Gas Industries here in the USofA & Canada, and spinning it, that they're doing it to clean up the Planet, but are actually still burning the Oil & Gas, to supply the 75% that we need……..but they're buying the Oil & Gas from Saudi Arabia/Middle East & Venezuela. Having typed all of that, the cure is NOT to stop burning Fossil Fuels………..it's to stop burning the BAD/TOXIC Fossil Fuels (i.e.: Coal, #6 Fuel/Bunker C, and Diesel Fuels). If the whole Planet could stop burning the BAD Fossil Fuels, I'm convinced that the Planet could heal itself. Don't be lazy. Look at photos online of smoke stacks burning Coal and then look at stacks burning Natural Gas…..you'll be amazed at the difference.
remeber when bill nye was in a pro oil disney ride? (ellens energy adventure) glad he changed his mind.
Food for the sheep … a crock of deception designed to steal farms from under the feet of European families who have lived on the land for generations
RiteuseofscienceisblessingsbutwrongmisuseofscienceisCURSE😅now😅
WHO IS HERE FROM SCHOOL
ITS ME MARCEL
Would be cool if he mixed in some science and physics in his political rant.
they must pay you in the millions for you to do this without cracking up at your own words! Bill Nye the Puppet Guy!
Who is watching this for their sns exam😂
winter of 2023-2024 guy here, hardly had a winter
They should’ve put the bill nye intro at the front🥲
Well how come the parts per million where much higher in pre historic time 20 times higher than today. Seems to me things grew a lot bigger and the earth was much much greener. Maybe we need to start planting millions and millions of trees. This is a hoax. Just look it up. This is not about climate change it's about they want to depopulate and only have millions of people instead of billions. You people need to read from what I read it was 20 times higher than today and 10 degrees warmer that does not sound like we have an emergency. We just have elites who want us gone and brainwashed people who believe this and don't read to find out the truth..
Last thing I need is Rem in a bowtie telling me what to believe.
As someone who has worked in the science industry this is pseudoscience. The Earth's climate is always changing. Besides within the last 150 years the temps have only changed.03 degrees the Earth constantly goes through periods of cooling and warming.
Why was water vapor excluded from your pie chart? It is the largest green house gas in the atmosphere, no? Could this be propaganda? Here are a handful of failed predictions: Arctic ice cap melting by 2013, NYC west highway under water by 2000, polar bear extinction (they are flourishing), Mt. Kilimanjaro glaciers gone, Glacier National Park glaciers gone by 2030, Maldives uninhabitable by the year 2000. When do you start questioning the narrative? When do you change your predictions to match reality? Question the climate change industrial complex. They are wasting billions of dollars.
LOL
This is fun to look at
SSos fGlobal warming benefits for the biosphere has . Evidence please read the history of the earth. Global cooling death for the biosphere
Wt The higher the temperature, the more the oceans will evaporate, then there will be more humidity and more precipitation, the desert will decrease plants regarding moisture and carbon dioxide will grow faster, the history of the earth is such that if global warming was antiquity, then it was a paradise for the biosphere,. .and when global cooling was then the evaporation of the oceans would decrease and precipitation would decrease, the desert would increase, this would collapse for the biosphere, the largest desert Antarctica, the hottest place the rainforests.
Climate Change is really terrifying.
Bill Nye is awesome!!!
Bruh bill nye is old
I dispute the hypothesis bc it violates basic laws of thermal dynamics. I dont need to count polar bears or tree rings if the model is fatally flawed. It's not at all political or emotional. It's just basic science. I don't care why people manipulate it. You can debate that. The fact is, it's poor science let's move on.
What a bad video
Bill 'Not a scientist' Nye
Bill nye is an entertainer not a scientist . He would tell
You men can get periods and have babies !
Bye Nye lying again? No suprise there.
I am
who here is watching this in 2024 for school
Who's watching this because of school forcing you virtually
After all this warning. the priority still is keeping the rich's wealth and keeping t economic classes as it is today.
At the end, everybody dies. only a matter of how soon.
Isn't that great?
Analysis that proves anthropogenic emissions cannot possibly cause global warming!
It is a stupidity to propagandize this fallacy!
There are two largest contributors of what they call Green House Effect
1.-Water Vapor (clouds)
2.-Dust
These two main Green House elements cannot (by now) be quantified with any degree of certainty due to their variability and massive dimensions. All models “prefer” no to include them or just assign a marginal incidence in order to validate their models on which they to begin with insert the resulting warming increment, this practice is aberrantly stupid in fact, a fraud.
In top of these “perverse deliberated omissions” other very serios factors larger than anthropogenic emissions like: soils respiration (plants and biota like microbes, insects and animals) as well as earth mantel degassing and continental displacements, and oceans biota, all this many times larger when compared with human activity and emissions are either erased or manipulated to serve their propaganda a business worth trillion dollars plus.
Ratios of the C-12 isotope compared to C-13
Plant/animal matter is comprised of carbohydrate molecules with roughly 1 carbon for every 2 hydrogen atoms (Carbon : Hydrogen ratio around 1:2)
Fossil Fuel Sources:
Contain higher ratios of the C-13 isotope from being underground for millions of years
Fossil fuels like coal, oil, natural gas have higher Carbon : Hydrogen ratios, ranging from around 1:1 to 1:1.5
So, while the total carbon emissions were:
400.35 Gt C/year
We can break this down further in order to determine causation, and forcing from CO2 emitters:
Natural Sources (soil, ocean, volcanic):
367.35 Gt C/year (91.02%)
Predominantly C-12 isotope
C:H ratio around 1:2
Vs Fossil Fuel Sources (Coal, Gas and Petroleum):
33 Gt C/year (8.98%)
Higher C-13 isotope
C:H ratio 1:1 to 1:1.5
This isotopic and molecular differentiation allows tracking the relative contribution of natural vs fossil fuel derived carbon sources.
The very high level of natural carbon emissions from sources like soil respiration, volcanic/degassing activity, and ocean processes – totaling over 367 Gt C per year (clouds and dust not accounted for).
The relatively small contribution of fossil fuel emissions at around 33 Gt C per year, is dwarfed by natural sources.
The differentiation of carbon isotopes and molecular compositions, showing the natural sources are overwhelmingly comprised of C-12 and Carbon : Hydrogen ratios typical of natural processes and organic matter.
Essentially, it is physically and thermodynamically impossible for the relatively minute anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions to be the driving force behind global temperature changes and climate fluctuations. The sheer magnitude of natural sun activity, carbon cycles, water vapor and dust processes and emissions utterly dwarf to near 0.0181% all human contributions.
The real scientific logic mathematical evidence points to natural phenomena like sun cycles earth orbital changes, dust, water vapor, soil respiration, ocean dynamics, and geological activity being the principal drivers of temperature and always changing climate on earth, carbon flows and compositions in the atmosphere and oceans. Whilst human emissions definitely play a role, they are a small fraction compared to the Sun, Water Vapor, Dust, Biomass and Earth’s system sources.
Based on the data analyzed, we must conclude that human fossil fuel use and its emissions cannot possibly be the overriding force dictating global climate and temperature trends. Natural processes and emissions cycles operating over centuries and millennia are the vastly predominant factors shaping the climate system.
In summary, anthropogenic emissions as the lead climate change driver is absolutely, thermodynamically, physically, unsupportable based on the radiation, convection, emission, sources, volumes, isotopic compositions, and molecular signatures involved from all and any real scientific perspective.
Carbon dioxide is present in our atmosphere. 400 parts per million. a million particles: 780k are nitrogen , 210K are oxygen , 9K are argon and 400 of these particles are carbon dioxide. Plants depend on CO2.
He looks so much older
But the PM of India Narendra Modi thinks that climate hasn't actually changed.. It is we who changed by ageing every year moving towards older and older..thats why we feel hotter and hotter.. This statement of PM needs to reach global stage and discuss..or else its too scary for a country who is also a major contributed in the cause of global warming and the Pm doesn't know about its cause and affects..
Why is he being accepted as a science guy? He's only a mechanical engineer. If he wants to talk about how to build a bridge or a house he's an expert.
Ppl should be worried about this than Palestine/Gaza/Israel
😂😂😂😂 Stupid liers
The climate change
Because the government
Destroy the climate
With
Conspiracy HAARP
Why is this even news the climate as been changing for over a million years and will continue doing so no matter what humans do or don’t do.
He's absolutely right here I would love to see a climate change video with both bill Nye & al gore together
i have prepared it for my declamation at zonal level
Who else is watching this to better explain it to right wing, not scientifically educated people in their lives?
Nuh uhhhhhhhhh
….
im in science class rigth now and this scares me
My teacher told me that every 100years the Earth's temperature rises by 1°c
If you think that 0.04% of the Earth's atmosphere is something to get upset about you must be getting paid to doing it.