April 5, 2025

45 thoughts on “What if there were 1 trillion more trees? – Jean-François Bastin

  1. Trees are wonderful and we should truly love them. But they are not a remedy to our man-made situation. Trees store carbon, they do not eliminate it and they store it in form of themselves, as their tissues grow and consume carbon to do so. Yet, once they die, our beloved decomposers, such as mushrooms, will return that carbon back. Of course that is desired, as the carbon must cycle, so that all may partake in it. However it tells us of the problem clearly. The carbon will not go away. In our greed, though it was understandable at the time, we have released carbon that has long remained dormant in the ground. From oil, to coal, they were remains of animals and plants that were not decomposed, for at the time, the decomposers lacked the ability (mushrooms could not decompose lignin) or could not access them. Now we release them back into the atmosphere, where they have no right to be, not if we want to maintain the delicate balance that governs all life and death. That is not even to say that vast majority of carbon that a tree stores is actually stored within the walls and tendrils of their mycorrhizal symbiont, their mushroom friend beneath the ground. There are so many issues we need to tackle here and admit that we are dealing with higher powers. Not even trees are an answer to every carbon problem. Indeed, planting trees in a grassland might as well damage the established ecosystems (meadows, wild grasslands) that hold just as much carbon as forests. Often do we end up thinking about solving an issue of degrading biosphere, by creating arboreal monocultures that might just end up being invasive and destructive in their own right.

    EDIT: To add to the apparent wall I created – in my homeland, Slovenia, the forest coverage during, or rather just after, the communist era of Yugoslavia, during which Slovenia supported nigh everything industrial and agricultural as the powerhouse of Yugoslavia, was mere 35%. By the time I was visiting elementary school in 2000s-2010s, the forest coverage was 66%, without any major human intervention. In a few decades, the forests recovered immensely and I am proud to say that wherever you go in this little Alpine country, you will be met with seas of (semi)wild forests, some even untouched by humans ever. Healthy forests will restore themselves.

  2. As if we know already, nowadays earth has to deal with a CO2 drought. That's killing for all the plants. If the CO2 degree gets lower we have to face a totall dy out of the plants. The degree has to double at least, maybe triple.
    The temperature will raise 2° C. And that's not a problem! The earth is just, since late 1800, coming out of a small ice-age. The temperature hás to raise.
    But thát is a unconvenient truth….

  3. Somehow fails to make clear that trees “.sequestering” carbon from the atmosphere are not doing this as some kind of public service….they need it to live and grow. All,plants do; carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a prerequisite of a greener world, not its death knell. Loss of carbon in the environment would be our real death knell. A world without plants. Remember that the planet is subject to intermittent glacial periods in which great ice packs form at both poles, and then melt back. There used to be trees and animals in Antarctica a million years ago. Conversely, in the very recent(geological) past all of Britain north of the Thames, all of Ireland and much of Northern Europe were under great ice sheets as recently as 20000 years ago. So it may be that a hotter world is the normal world, and what we have now is the recurring aberration correcting itself.

  4. If there’s a trillion more trees? There’s be lots of greedy people who want to log 🪵 them and want to get rich and they will also try to get the give approval of the government (mostly corrupt politicians ) making the bill tittle “nations prosperity bill no#14”.

  5. I think that all the gov must encourage a plant or a tree to all citizen depending on the size or plot of land they possess. Too many people opts for house or apartment with zero green area ( exception for grass )

  6. I think it would be better to give someone a potted perennial flower or potted tree than some cut flowers. Nothing is better than plants that will be around; all year round.

  7. Climate change refers to? long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns?
    Human activities are not the main driver of what we have termed, climate change.
    Recognising that the sun is the main contributor to our temperatures is important.
    It has absolutely nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.
    Sun storms are correlative with the current causes of our temperature fluctuations.
    The 'deserts' and 'sea levels' however, 'they' indeed have been created, by mankind.

    Jean-François Bastin, interesting question "What if there were 1 trillion more trees?"
    Understandably, just how many trees do you think they are currently cutting down?
    So you know, 'People cut down 15 billion trees each year, on one global tree count'.
    United, the deforestation, estimated 46% since the beginning of human civilization.
    So his question, is to more than double the just over 400 billion trees on the planet.
    (:It would be 1.4 Trillion trees, keep in mind 800 billion estimated, before mankind;)

Leave a Reply to @BladeMasterz916 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *