April 5, 2025

28 thoughts on “‘Two things’ would come from a net zero commitment

  1. Point one: yes, it is going to cost a lot but doing nothing sill cost us a lot more in the long run. Point two: if you see this happen than you should do your job as a journalist and hold the government to account.

  2. ⛅🗽I just wanna see the sun shine tomorrow diamond label vision of before life the source of success is illuminati face the new order de future not history EMEN! Mafia Life Dream Chases Washington D.C. United States of AMERICA is Loyalty illuminaty we some success God bless UNITED STATES. We bless être dad God #Baphomet Shemhamforash! 🙏🏾#FreeMeekMill🤘🏾!!.

  3. Solar isn't the problem if its individual choice for homes but industry will not function on it. It's the forced envirocommo's compliance that gets me. I'm at some point putting an extension on my home and because I'm using floor boards I have to #1 pay for a 1 KW solar set up minimum as an "offset" , regardless of what I use it for I could use it to power the chook house if I want or just store it away and not use it but I'm being forced to buy one and #2 I have to install a fan where the outside decking will be under cover, that's right a ceiling fan for the outside. Their argument being that if there's a fan outside people are less likely to stay inside during summer and use airconditioning. The plans will not be accepted by the council if the solar setup and fan isn't included.

  4. The lefties still can't accept that their climate lies have done permanent damage to Australia and its future generations. I love how the leftists always know every nuance of pork-barreling and immediately think in those terms, instead of thinking what is best for the country.

  5. The people telling us we can do net zero in Australia better than anywhere in the world are those trying to make a lot of money from it. If it could be done so easily then they could do it without having to get taxpayers to fund it. They just want to blackmail the government with this crappy science then gouge taxpayers to create a crappy power grid that will probably not work. Just look how successful tim flannery was with the geothermal power after gouging us for 90 million. If its so easy show us this technology and we will think about it, don't take our money and give us another french sub program

  6. I Don't Know Why They're Feeding Charles At All; They Certainly Don't Seem To Be Feeding Greta!! And If They Succeed In Eliminating C.O.2, They Won't Be Feeding Any Of Us, Because Nothing Grows Without It!!! C.O.2 is NOT a Pollutant; It's An Entirely Beneficial Gas; The Only Element That Enables Photosynthesis!! Greenery Depends On C.O.2, But These Idiots Are Playing To Their Masters In Peking, To Establish Chinese Communist Party Hegemony Globally!!!

  7. Sorry Paul, but no, intelligent people do not believe in climate change.
    Intelligent people understand it is all about shifting wealth throughout the world.
    It's purely an economic plan to control us all more effectively.
    WTF happened to you to sprout that BS line?
    You get a good sponsor that convinced you to change your rhetoric?

  8. Why would Australia sacrifice its biggest export & source of income -coal to the demands of the world's Billionaires Club? Weren't they the culprits themselves? Can they stop China, India, & OPEC countries, Iran, Russia, from producing fossil fuel & using them? Coal, Gas were God's gifts to mankind. We can diversify but not Zero. People die less due to calamities but more through war & greed for World Power.

  9. if an ignorant teenager preaches dogmas about how to live and a crowd of supposedly wise politicians, scientists, journalists listens to it and applauds it, it means that the world has gone to the dogs…

Leave a Reply to @dennisbassanese6328 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *