April 8, 2025

22 thoughts on “Trade-offs with Nationals for net zero unclear

  1. That's got to be a red flag when they use the old "you use technology stop complaining" I draw the line at tracking, using my facial features, knowing what I'm thinking. Censoring free speech. Let's see telling me how many kilometres I can drive, or you've had your fair share of protein meats this week missy, Your health is declining OUT. But I'm sure our kind devoted government would never do anything too wicked.

  2. الحمد لله في الحقيقة الفيديو الخاص بك اصبح جميل جدا في الحقيقة كلنا نعظ الاسلام وفي الحقيقة انا ايضا صنعت الفيديو بجهد كبير.

  3. there will never be a net zero its impossible since we all breathe out CO2 the very thing they want to get rid of.

    its just a stealth tax and another way to control people end of story

  4. Net zero. No! This is just, we all pay more as they take more control, we have less and less freedom. They created climate change and now they are creating a way to take from us to fix their made up emergency.

  5. LUCIFERIAN PEOPLE $$$$$$$
    JESUS IS COMING HOME PRAISE GOD 👏 🙌 🙏 TO ALL LUCIFERIAN PEOPLE JESUS IS COMING FOR YOU MAY JESUS PUNISH ALL YOU SWIFTLY $$$$$AMEN 🙏 🙌 WORLD 🌎 MUST WAKE..

  6. He says we'll get the modeling in a few weeks, and yet he's off to Scotland to sign us all up, when he comes back we'll be signatories to a plan we know nothing about or the cost. Arse about face I'd say.

  7. The fact that Australia has bought into the propaganda that we are in a “climate crisis” caused by the burning of fossil fuels is terrifying. If you support the “Net-Zero” policy, you are either ignorant of the true science , a coward, or you are set up to benefit financially from the policy.
    Much like the COVID-19 hysteria, the entire “Green” climate crisis narrative is about creating fear so that the government can gain more power.
    If anyone had the courage to investigate the science behind these policies, it would reveal that none of this is based on science. It is based on computer modeling which has been shown to be wrong time and time again.
    We need CO2 for life. There is no scientific data that can conclusively determine to what degree human activity contributes to global warming. Additionally, there is no data to support the theory that CO2 is the thermostat of the planet. Simply adding or eliminating CO2 and claiming that will have any effect on climate has no scientific basis. It is simply an assumption derived from computer models that fail over and over again.
    Until someone (other than the scientists who have been cancelled) gain the courage to challenge the entire premise of this fabricated emergency, we will suffer and our children will suffer and our environment will suffer.
    Wind and Solar are devastating for our environment. They are inefficient, unreliable, and unaffordable. Go nuclear.
    No they oppose that as well. This is an effort to fundamentally transform our world into a dystopian nightmare of scarcity and dependence on government.
    Let’s Go Brandon!!!

  8. I really hate this logic. Let's shit tank our viable energy production models to suit my ideological possession and junk, politically maligned climate change science and then let's hope that somebody smarter than me figures out how to keep the light on with hypothetical technology that no one has thought to implement yet because my mobile phone is so cool. What an absolute lunatic.

  9. I'll bet that the "modelling" contains provisions which have nothing to do with the issues at hand and everything to do with the nature of our federal and state governments response to the covid plandemic which must factor into any future spending. In other words, any infrastructure spending must be predicated on reasonably accurate population demographics, and that's what Morrison doesn't want any scrutineers to see. It's curious how they seem to separate themselves from the population et al. It suggests that not everyone on the benches is "in the know", and given Morrison's final outburst about non-specific "technology", there's obviously something about that which needs to be 'buried' before the modelling is released.
    I think that there's a bunch of "foxes" in the government "henhouse"!

Leave a Reply to @LordEriolTolkien Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *