April 5, 2025

26 thoughts on “Honest Government Ad | Net Zero (feat. Greta Thunberg)

  1. When I heard Greta say that she wants world governments to be honest about the climate crisis, it suddenly dawned on me – hey, I make this series called Honest Government Ads… I might be able to help here. So I wrote this Honest Government Ad. And then I asked Greta if she'd be in it. She told me she's "a huge fan". And so here we are. 💛 Giordano

  2. & Billionaires are paying off the Government.
    Better they are getting work with them after letting them take, do what they want, not pay royalties and forget those clean-ups. They cut into profit, so can't have that.
    But..
    They got Plans
    For them, of course
    Destination get us the F*©K
    Somewhere else.

  3. And, no one ever talks about animal agriculture and commercial fishing. Too many people think we can just stop using fossil fuels to stop climate change.
    Without taking on animal agriculture and commercial fishing issues there is zero chance of halting climate change, even if all fossil fuel usage stopped tomorrow.
    If we focused on animal agriculture and commercial fishing, rewilding and rehabilitation of ecosystems to make them stable, they are the most significant carbon sinks we can rely on. Its not just a glib "trees" solution. We could possibly even continue on the snails pace on fossil fuels , and start reversing climate change.
    This is not controversial. It has most of the knowledgeable science behind it.

  4. I'm NOT buying a stupid EV, and there is no other practical way to get around where I live, so I'm sticking with my ICE vehicle, climate change be damned. If they really want to clean up the environment, start putting something in the tap water that makes people sterile. Fewer people will always result in less carbon emissions.

  5. the world is currently coming out of an ice age… calling it climate change and fighting it… seems like oversimplifying the nuanced nature of this topic…

  6. I gotta admit… I'm at an age where debates of climate change make me chuckle.

    Because it's probably not going to affect me very much. And it's the dumb majority who keeps voting for parties that aren't willing to do anything about this. Yeah, it's unfortunate that the minority has to suffer the consequences too but… hopefully, they'll stop having children and just leave the planet to the idiots who will then all be gone in a few decades.

  7. Net Zero: The bulk of you will own nothing, eat bugs and die young, while the elite fly around in private Boeings and dine on steak and lobster and drink champagne.

  8. I still find it hilarious that people actually buy into global warming and carbon demonisation – based on a THEORY.
    The so called fossil fuel industry is actually abiotic 😉

    Net zero = no life.

    We are the carbon they want to get rid of.

    Wake up.

  9. people must be net zero by 2050!!!. at 2024 people are already almost there. a bit more to go, please. taxes must be raised to 100% to achieve that goal. gross 100 – 100% tax = net 0

  10. Read "Unsettled" by Steve Koonin to get a better handle on how data are manipulated or omitted to fuel the climate "crisis" narrative. We have no chance of reaching net zero by 2050, and probably not by the end of this century.

  11. Here's a true fact to make sense of it all …. when uk parliament was introduced about a thousand years ago, we used a language comprising of 'old French'. Parle or parla in French means to speak/talk …. the word Ment in French means 'lie' …. 100% true fact ❤

  12. Governments fear (and rightly so) the reactions of citizens to truthful proclamations regarding human-caused climate differentials. It is highly offensive to ultra-consumers in first-world nations to hear that they are the drivers of this catastrophe. I applaud this YouTube channel for laying bare the government cover-up and inaction but to be truly effective you have to make the end-consumer appalled by their own inaction enough to effect radical change. This is easier stated than done as ultra-consumers are ultra-dependent upon entirely unsustainable systems and they will throw ultra-unsustainable funds at that system to keep it in place. This is where we are at. I wish I had solutions but just pointing it out at this juncture seems like a task unto itself.

Leave a Reply to @tempest411 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *