April 6, 2025

28 thoughts on “Investment in technology needed for net zero

  1. Fossil fuel subsidies top $22,000 " per minute " of taxpayers money under Hawaiian Scott's LNP government as Australians go hungry homeless abused and abandoned by Hawaiian Scott himself………….
    🛫🏖️🍹
    That's twenty two thousand taxpayer dollars per minute to subsidise the fossil fuel industry 🏭 via Hawaiian Scott's LNP government….🤬

  2. I do agree that the oil companies are going to suck you dry for the next 3 years! So if you stick a pipe up your arse sell them back to the corporations they still wouldn't give you the time of day just ask your sheep! Wait a minute I meant your voters!

  3. We have a sawmill and sell tons of wood a month from trees we farmed from more than 20 years ago. Planting every 3 years to replace. If you are worried about carbon, I got you covered, dear reader. We fell thousands of trees and planted even more. Missed this planting season because of gout but will carry on as soon as I can move. Plant trees, use lumber, repeat.

  4. Why don't you sell the over unitiy device developed in the 80's and sold to our military, which turned it into a backpack unit that can power a small home forever? Just as l thought, unless it does not threaten oil forget it.

  5. Pretty hard to deny the success of renewables when other countries are rapidly overtaking us and we're stuck in the dark ages because our gov bends at the knee for lobbyists

  6. Net 0 is NOT achievable. You can stand on your head and whistle through your bums all you like, it ain't gonna happen. Unless of course you plan on depopulating the earth as the old deagle report mentioned.
    If you want to reduce emissions, then look at nuclear, and there are technologies which do away with radioactive waste.
    Solar and wind are basically useless, might be good for suburban dwellings, but that's where it stops.
    Batteries have to be replaced every say 4yrs and at around $15-20k I don't think it's an economically viable solution.
    Besides, they don't have the efficiency of nuclear, and that's all that there is to it.
    All the talk and no action clearly shows no-one is actually really interested in doing anything.

  7. In the meantime we are sitting at home having lost our jobs for no reason other than forceful vaccination of a drug that has been developed using a process that raises both ethical, moral and religious consciences. We have been forgotten and treated like dirt with zero rights. No income and bills to pay and kicked out of employment. Cannot travel out of the country to secure employment elsewhere and cannot work in the country either. Meanwhile, Businesses have stalled, hurting with labour shortages and empty food shelves for lack of workers, amid soaring labour costs, which translates to inflation prices to customers. Another own goal. Who makes these thoughtless, unscrutinised policies?

  8. Net zero is a UN scam… it’s a way to redistribute energy and manufacturing to where the UN wants to put it. The main goal is to weaken the US. Take it’s successful companies and ‘place’ them in a ‘poor’ country… to redistribute wealth…. that’s the global equity part. The UN wants to be the Global Distributor of energy and who can produce what. as well as the global distributor of medicine. The New Global World Order that Biden/Kerry are referring to is the UN Global Equity and Climate Change Agenda for 2030. The new Global Commanders….the UN.

  9. Why do you guys down under believe in this climate change crap. Nothing humans can do will pollute the atmosphere more than one volcanic eruption a year and how many have we had this year ? Instead of following the science you are just following the money.

  10. Another hair brained scam from the eco-Left. The idea that Gov't can influence the weather is preposterous and utopian. This is a fringe issue that has little bearing on the day to day concerns of ordinary Australians: Australians who are working hard and seeing nothing coming back for it. It's always the shrill inner city types who dominate public debate at the expense of the average citizen, by presenting their issues as existential threats or emergencies that are too important to be debated or subjected to scrutiny, and must be acted upon immediately. It's time middle Australia spoke up for their own interests. If not, the future will be hijacked by ever more mad ideas.

Leave a Reply to @chriswhite3447 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *