
Watch on TV: Virgin 604, Freesat 216, Sky 515, Freeview 236, YouView 236
Listen on DAB+ Radio
Download the GB News App to watch live wherever you are, catch up with all our shows and get the latest news from the GBN family. https://www.gbnews.uk/freegbapp
Don’t forget to follow us on social media too!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GBNEWS
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GBNewsOnline
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gbnewsonline/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/gb-news/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@gbnews
Click here for the latest Covid-19 guidance from the World Health Organisation ► https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public
Click here for the latest NHS information on COVID-19 vaccines
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/coronavirus-vaccine/
source
"The parties had a manifesto and agenda." It's not democracy if there is no choice.
i had an electric car for one week never again, could not get 80 miles out of it needed charging could not find a compatible charger a nightmare
Ann and Jacob Rees-Mogg are the two brains in the Conservative Party and hopefully, Mrs Braverman pronounced Brav as in brand er man.
I am the greenest person I know because I began in 1981 but I don't go along with all this Left-Wing rubbish that green has become now.
I would love to listen to Ann for two hours.
Most of the scientists I have worked with in UK universities are Chinese or some other but not old-family British.
The first organisation to run wind power were the NAZI Party.
The countries that have NEVER had a Christian leader are the most poluting.
You didn't allow Ann to speak. You should not waist her time .
The Left should leave Britain and go and live in a Left Wing nation that is run by proper Left Wing people such as North Korea and China.
Short answer: yes.
Any major change should be voted on by the general public, not decreed by those who wish it so.
Is it STILL a question?
Simple answer yes we are starting to resemble the lemmings not lol 😂
👌
GB News, please stop interviewing or giving these globalist mouthpieces airtime: if people want to hear morons repeating slogans they can go to virtually all the other broadcasters.
Firstly, people don't vote 'for.' They vote against the incompetent and corrupt party currently in power. The manifesto of the other party is read in this light; i.e. Is it a tolerable alternative to the current shabby crew? Also firstly, a manifesto is a package deal. To infer the positive endorsement of every aspect of that package is false and misleading.
Secondly, net zero by 2050 is endorsed by both parties!
It is a global policy commitment.
There is no democratic choice.
And thirdly, anyone who knows anything knows that net zero is a lie!
Net zero is actually a compound lie. It's not just that it's unachievable; nor merely that it's kicking the can down the road until the science suggests it will be too late, but that, even were it a sincere and achievable policy, it would not address the global reality of the climate and ecological crisis.
I could explain why at great length, but suffice to say – the earth is a big ball of molten rock containing limitless heat energy easily converted to constant heavy duty electricity and clean burning hydrogen fuel, and the world needs reliable and abundant clean energy to meet the challenges ahead, particularly poor and populous countries like India and China, because, if they continue to develop using fossil fuels, the UK imposing crippling taxation and infrastructure spending to achieve net zero wouldn't make the least little difference globally.
We'll be living in factories like the Georgians 😡
It will be net zero for for the plebes but not for the elites.
Simon is stupid – another gullible politician who does not question…help us with this kind of tunnel vision thinking
The world would be a better place and pollution, if not stopped entirely, could be more easily controlled if there were less people on the planet. New Zealand is about the size of Britain, but has a population of only 5 million compared to the UK’s 65 million or so, considerably less than a tenth of the UK population. But it enjoys a high standard of living, as high, if not higher then the UK.
Why could the Uk not have a similar population? Less people means less cars, factories and so on, and renewables could supply a larger percentage of energy needs.
As it is, world population will increase at least until the mid 2080s – Beyond the lifetimes of most of us living today – when it will have increased to at 10 and a half billion people. That fact alone would make a return to a lifestyle of several centuries, even thousands of years ago, totally impossible.
People who advocate net zero and no use of fossil fuels at all should practice what they preach. In reality though, that is impossible, certainly for decades to come.
Zero carbon means next to zero human life on Earth(Agenda 2030)this is about EVIL totalitarian NWO…there is NO CLIMATE CRISIS…
Why do the mighty media not give equal prominence to those who disagree with the "Net Zero" predictions.