April 6, 2025

23 thoughts on “‘New developments’ in critical minerals will take us to ‘net zero emissions’: Resources Minister

  1. Fucking 300 viewer on you tube for your news videos ? Even an Asian dancing girl in ticktock easily can get 100k views nowadays, does Sky news even can afford life expenses with 300 views 😂😂

  2. Does she use a mobile phone? Recall that mining is a dirty industry creating emissions but give them the support and opportunity to open up newer areas to obtain necessary minerals needed in industries

  3. Getting to Net Zero by 2050 would cost $9.2 trillion a year globally (McKinsey). That's not going to be good value for money. That's nearly one-tenth of global GDP. That money would be better spent on a myriad of things including educating the fifth of humanity who are illiterate and represent a 7% annual loss to the world's economy. Any country that attempts it will be indebted or impoverished.
    Example: For the UK to reach net zero by electrification of its transport fleet and heating system, it will require a tripling of its current electrical generation capacity among other things. This will essentially require the UK consuming all of the current global supply of copper and other rare metals for the next 20 years. The cost will be unaffordable and the skilled manpower levels unattainable. And that is just to eliminate the 1% of the global CO2 emissions that the UK is responsible for. So times that by 100 for the Earth. Imagine the damage done from all that resource extraction! And for what?
    Maddeningly, there is no climate crisis. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past.

  4. The fact that people whose STEM education is inferior to that of a preschooler making policy to crush millions of poor people is wild, but typically Australian. Look at the roads.

Leave a Reply to @uweb.8269 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *