April 5, 2025

20 thoughts on “Net Zero by 2050 is not happening

  1. YOU forgot to add solar farms and wins farms will need replacing around 20 years. This net zero are in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. Also the science is quick to predict what the temperature, but we know more people die tens of times more from cold than heat but no one is prepared to say what the expected death rate will be if people can not afford the price of fuel.

  2. We have been through these mineral shortages before with copper and oil but they come to nothing. Mining comanies only keep 10 years of resources on the books for future production and each year they put another year in place. We were running out of lithium and now we have tonnes of it and the price has collapsed. Getting rid of messy mining operations such as coal and oil would be a good swap for a few silver mines.

  3. "The transition to Net Zero, just from a limited increasingly expensive mineral resource perspective, is challenging to near-impossible."

    Br0uGhT to U bY OuR Sp0nSoR RARE EARTH METAL EXTRACTION PROFITS Limited!

  4. That stock is listed on an Over the Counter exchange (OTCMKTS), meaning they don't meet the requirements to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, or other big exchanges. No, thank you.

  5. Since we must run out of fossil fuels eventually, we might as well tackle that problem now.
    If mineral resources are a constraint on alternatives, then are any of those resources limited? What is the solution to that?

  6. I think nuclear fission and eventually fusion is the answer we should already be largely run on nuclear energy already if it wasn’t for the fear mongering, it’s seems like the pathway that takes us to the future, it couldn’t be more obvious at this point

Leave a Reply to @jeraldrabie7392 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *