April 6, 2025

20 thoughts on “Rishi Sunak rolls back net zero targets in reset of UK climate policies

  1. You get massive amounts of free energy by putting small amount of electricity on one end of quartz crystal which makes it give out massive amounts of electricity from other end of quartz crystal.

    If governments were truly worried about global warming they'd be working hard to find ways to produce infinite ♾ free energy. But they are not. You dont have to wonder why either, its so obvious.

  2. Do I love Rishi Sunak? Well, well well, he has proven me correct in my assessment of him. An intelligent, rich and handsome guy and therefore confident of himself and does not have to bow to the hysterical leftist's crazy agenda of impoverishing / controlling us through their various Co2 laws towards implementing the New World Order aka Global reset. We don't mind a New Global reset, if the ultimate aim is not enacting laws that will severely curtail our freedoms of movement-, speech-, religion-, and pursuit of happiness as their "Gender / Racism/ Climate Change etc., activisms tend to promote.

    Well done Sunak for your pragmatism (more correctly truthfulness ). Science /technology is not yet able to provide all the electric cars /charging points, heat pumps etc needed but the crazies want to penalise us for nothing. Take ULEZ, pay £12.50 and pollute as much as you want. That is day light stealing. If everyone wanted a non Co2 polluting car today, can the industry meet the demand? NO. It is therefore an unjust law and is why people feel emboldened and justified in destroying the spy cameras. You must carry the population along with you. That is, we decide the pace – it is a Democracy after all.

  3. People are actually complaining about having cheaper gas and affordable food I will never understands Europe and their priorities like do you want to eat for an affordable price or possibly save the world 500 years from now

  4. Climate change is inevitable! The climate of the world has always been changing! No one is arguing that. It's fact, simple. But when the powers-that-be start bringing in a raft of so-called "green" taxes and various charges & levies, that comes out of the pockets of the hard – pressed public, people get cynical and disbelieving and begin to wonder just how money can stop an unstoppable, natural process! My view is that natural climate change is made to look worse than it is, as a reason to bring in new taxes and levies. The terms "net zero" and "carbon footprint" are prime examples and all the scaremongering is just about gaining funds for personal agendas and projects, that are not always in the best interests of the people – who struggle to make ends meet, endlessly!

  5. Will someone just at least tell us with zero carbon in precise numbers where the electricity is going to come from, even if the grid could handle it, when there is no wind. Half of the nuclear capacity will be decommissioned by 2050 under current plans, little solar in winter even if the always low on the horizon sun is actually visible. It as seems to be a grand idealistic plan with little consideration of any practicalities, only vague assurances that someone will surely think of something in time do not worry. There does not seem to be any money for running even basic social welfare and housing let alone some vast infrastructure rebuild. I am too old to be affected but really despair for the young in this country with these ruthless unforgiving short term plans being imposed from afar.

  6. you all need to check in with what Tony Blair's policy on Net Zero currently is; he rightly points out that britain's current greenhouse emissions, and its historical emissions, are insignificant on a global scale; we are far better placed to test out green tech so it is suitable for mass implementation. Reliance on oil imports leaves us vulnerable to foreign reimes with terrible human rights records, but green energy uses many many minerals that are also under the monopoly of such countries, and Russia is one of the global leaders in production of many of these key minerals as well. We in the West cannot reasonably go Green without the cooperation of Russia; as things stand we will spend $1 billion to reduce the rise in global temperatures by 1/5,000,000th of a degree celsius, using the plans and policies we are currently tied to. It is fairly obvious that the gullible do-gooders in the west are being exploited by cynical elements in the CCP, in a similar fashion to how the USSR used to use communists in the west to hamstring the west, the difference is that the Chinese seem to be far better at it!

  7. Why aren't our green taxes (added to petrol prices etc) paying for improved flood defences? Also, why are employees living in provided accomodation on campus being charged a benefit in kind tax when they're only trying to be green and cut down on work related car journeys? 🤔

Leave a Reply to @techtinkerin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *