May 19, 2025

30 thoughts on “Climate clash – the gap between net zero ambition and reality

  1. No one wants to have their day messed up by these protesters. Which makes them unpopular and intern turns the people against the ideas ofvthe protesters. As for ulez thats just legalised theft.

  2. Do we really think multinationals, Shell, BP etc will be happy with net zero.
    I doubt it, as these companys lobby governments more than we know.
    Net zero is a con.
    Wake up its never going happen people.

  3. The climate emergency scam is a control move by wef/who who say we must stop putting plant food into the atmosphere. There is no climate emergency, there is climate control though…..

  4. I'd very much rather listen to the fair journalism of Tom Clarke, than the rose-tinted environmentalistic hype of Tom Heap.
    Clarke does a very good job presenting both sides without bias, he does his research and interviews people in a fair, friendly manner. He seems to genuinely want to know what they think.
    Heap seems to patronise the viewer by only advertising the views of so-called 'experts' to the ignorance of any downside, while coming across as condescending to any differing opinion.

  5. What a load of drivel. Obviously the climate is important but net zero is impossible to achieve. We need some honest balanced research. A lot of what I’ve read has been debunked as bare faced lies all I see is climate alarmists which is dangerous in itself. The whole EV situation is a complete lie, Sadiq khan has been proved to have lied to get ulez in so who do we trust ? Not the government that’s for sure.

  6. We need carbon. Carbon is good. When this nonsense is affecting peoples ability to go about their business, that is a step too far. ULEZ needs scrapping. That is much more sinister than they say it is.

Leave a Reply to @omd4229 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *