20 thoughts on “The Inefficiency of Net-Zero | Lord Mervyn King”
When you have been the biggest polluter for generations and have developed your industries using carbon intensive fuels, it is hypocritical to then ask India and China not to develop. In actual fact China and India are making some strides towards net zero but not as much as developed nations.
it will ONLY penalise Europe while China continues to be the world leading polluter! if we want improvement the WORLD needs to ask them about it! not starve the smallest contributers while they run wild!
It is a scam to destabilise national economies and make those nations largely dependent on multi national corporation's for survival, wall street and britain financed the Russian revolution because the Russian economy would have been competitors of western corporation's, wall street even devised the russian 5 year plans after the revolution that controlled their economy. NEW WORLD ORDER (communism)
Net positive would be the plantation timber and dry land cotton because the cellulose/carbon becomes buildings and clothes aka stored. I still think net zero is a war on all life that doesn't produce chlorophyll.
Is there no one who studies the climate have any common sense? The climate has been changing since there was a world if not, weâd all be living in igloo has been changing ever since thereâs been an earth and it wouldnât because of humans and it always will change no matter how many billions of dollars or thrown at it. Somebody after in charge needs to use common sense to think about this.
Net zero in the U.K. will make a small difference to overall climate change but specifically in the U.K. it will decrease air pollution, decrease biodiversity loss, increase our green spaces and overall tree cover. Net zero is about becoming a more sustainable economy, a circular economy because we cannot continue to take from the planet and expect to live how we do. Something needs to change and if people donât realise that then theyâre blind
John Anderson Media 
When you have been the biggest polluter for generations and have developed your industries using carbon intensive fuels, it is hypocritical to then ask India and China not to develop. In actual fact China and India are making some strides towards net zero but not as much as developed nations.
alternative is to get rid of this lunacy
There is no climate emergency to even react to.
it will ONLY penalise Europe while China continues to be the world leading polluter!
if we want improvement the WORLD needs to ask them about it!
not starve the smallest contributers while they run wild!
Why won't the fools listen to intelligent people ?.
UN insanity
It's obvious the continuation of deindustrialization of western countries as a direct attack on their economies and future ability to be independent
It is a scam to destabilise national economies and make those nations largely dependent on multi national corporation's for survival, wall street and britain financed the Russian revolution because the Russian economy would have been competitors of western corporation's, wall street even devised the russian 5 year plans after the revolution that controlled their economy. NEW WORLD ORDER (communism)
John Anderson for PM.
Who is making Money đ°??
Net positive would be the plantation timber and dry land cotton because the cellulose/carbon becomes buildings and clothes aka stored. I still think net zero is a war on all life that doesn't produce chlorophyll.
Beginnings and endings. Render onto Caesar what is Caesar and render onto God what is Gods. Separation of State and religion.
Is there no one who studies the climate have any common sense? The climate has been changing since there was a world if not, weâd all be living in igloo has been changing ever since thereâs been an earth and it wouldnât because of humans and it always will change no matter how many billions of dollars or thrown at it. Somebody after in charge needs to use common sense to think about this.
Climate change assumes that there is no God.
Net zero in the U.K. will make a small difference to overall climate change but specifically in the U.K. it will decrease air pollution, decrease biodiversity loss, increase our green spaces and overall tree cover. Net zero is about becoming a more sustainable economy, a circular economy because we cannot continue to take from the planet and expect to live how we do. Something needs to change and if people donât realise that then theyâre blind
Best BoE Governor.
How about net excessive spending from the bank of england.
Anderson was one of those who got in the way of our childrenâs and grandchildrenâs futures. He is no shining light.
Just more ways they can erode our civil liberties.
I don't think this will fly on the day of judgement