April 6, 2025

35 thoughts on “Robert Jenrick: ‘I’m not an uncritical friend of Israel’

  1. everyone can see what Israel is doing wrong! where are the Christians supporting their fellow Christians in Lebanon's 50% are Christian. It shouldn't matter anyway as human life is being destroyed

  2. He was minister of immigration …… didn't he do a great job? didn't he solve the illegal immigration problem? didnt he put an end to those "charities" enabling the illegal immigrants? Didn't he tighten up and reduce the definition of "allowable family"? didnt he redefine "refugee" to eliminate fakers? didn't he put into place a deportation program for any immigrant committing a crime?
    Isn't he great at his job?

  3. So isn't anyone going to say that the only reason that there's mass migration is because the previous governments have always been meddling in the politics of their countries so they came here after the downfall of their countries. Also the lies told by the Zionists were all debunked by all MSM from the rapes to the number of the isreal offensive forces in the kibbutz were all killed by the IOF.

  4. Nobody in the Middle East wants a load of Americans and Europeans taking their land and pretending they come from there because their ancestors might have lived there thousands of years ago. Until Israel's supporters deal with that there will never be peace.

  5. He is a Zionist ✡️✡️✡️ serving Mossad. Arranged for porno king and Daily Express owner Desmond, another fellow ✡️, to receive planning permission for £40million worth of apartments on the Thames, after others were rejected many times, Jenrick ✡️boy approved it by bypassingbthe local council.

  6. His fruitless speech this morning sums up exactly where the Tories went wrong and why they will remain totally irrelevant for 5 years or so – meaningless jokes, absence of strategy, 4 complete nutjobs fighting for leadership from a Tory party membership unable to face the significance and necessity of total re-creation

  7. The Iron Wall" is an essay written in 1923 by Ze'ev Jabotinsky (born in Russia as Vladimir Yevgenyevich Zhabotinsky). It was originally written in Russian and published by the Russian press.[1]
    Jabotinsky wrote the essay after the British Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill prohibited Zionist settlement on the east bank of the Jordan River. He formed the Zionist Revisionism party after writing the essay.[2]
    Jabotinsky argued that the Palestinian Arabswould not agree to a Jewish majority in Palestine, and further noted that:
    "Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. Which means that it can proceed and develop only under the protection of a power that is independent of the native population – behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach."[1]
    The only solution to achieve peace and a Jewish state in the Land of Israel, he argued, would be for Jews to first establish a strong Jewish state, which would eventually prompt the Arabs leadership to become moderate, who would be more open to "mutual concessions."
    A week following the publication of this essay, Jabotinsky followed with "The Ethics of the Iron Wall," in which he argued that morality comes before everything else, and that Zionism is "moral and just," since it subscribes to "national self-determination" as a "sacred principle," which Arabs may also enjoy.[3]

    In Avraham "Avi" Shlaim's 2000 work, "The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World," Shlaim gives a brief overview of the background and history of Ze'ev Jabotinsky. In his work, Shlaim elaborates on Jabotinsky's Zionist Revisionistideals.[5] In his analysis of Jabotinksky's work, Shlaim noted Jabotinsky's argument that efforts to establish a Jewish state would require the assistance of European Western powers.[1] Shlaim's analysis of The Iron Wallfinds that Jabotinsky's followers considered the ideas put forth in the essay to be the basis for Revisionist Zionism.[5] However, Shlaim also concluded that the meaning behind the ideas devised by Jabotinsky was not fully understood, even by his followers. Shlaim stressed that Jabotinsky saw the "Iron Wall" not as an end to establishing a Jewish state, but simply as a means to end Arab hostility towards the Zionist movement.[5] Palestinian Arabs, according to Jabotinsky, would be privy to national rights in the newly formed Jewish state.[1] Shlaim notes that the nature of these rights is vague, though political autonomy of Arab Palestinians is suggested. Shlaim emphasizes Jabotinsky's acknowledgement of the Palestinian Arab national idenitity in his essay; and underlines Jabotinsky's belief that a military intervention is the only way to realise a Jewish state.[5]

  8. If the whole of irseal tuned muslim, it would end this madness. Proving it isn't about land it's the fact that they are Jews. Islam hates them and Christians. Quran: "worst of creatures"

  9. So let me get this straight, Israel are killing Palestinians, stealing all there land, locking them into an open air prison but we must take there side….

  10. The way to end the conflict today is for Israel to respect every single civilized rule of law. From Human rights. The ICJ has condemned them as an apartheid state.

Leave a Reply to @MrFunkyClaude Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *