April 22, 2025

41 thoughts on “Is a Climate Catastrophe Already Underway? | Naked Science S3 Meltdown | FULL EPISODE

  1. Denmark reports Greenland's ice loss/gain is near net zero. Ocean sea level rise is accountable due to expanded sea water from warmer oceans. All extremely thick ice sheets are water at the ground due to extreme pressures and trapping geothermic heat. No climate change from global warming that was to start at 1.5°C of global warming causing stronger observable hurricanes in the Gulf-of-America (Gulf-of-Mexico). NASA reports global warming at 1°C where it has been since 1992 after falling from its reported all time high of 1.1°C in 1991. The cause of global warming is not known in 2025. Earth's water vapor saturated greenhouse effect is due to water vapor adding 10°F (5.55°C) to earth’s average temperature absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth within a few meters of the radiating surface. The other greenhouse gasses can not change its overall effect.

    Earth's polar regions are warmed by warm ocean currents from the equator. This is the only mechanism that can move the large volumes of heat to have caused them in the geologic past to support subtropical forests. Continental drift shutdown much of these strong warm polar region circulating ocean currents.  

    The Arctic region is warming with the proving theory being warm Atlantic Ocean currents migrating more frequently and deeper into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. This is causing a few less weeks of reflective snow and ice coverage causing more solar heat gain to the region. The lower northern hemisphere has been slightly cooling in the hundredth of degrees Celsius.

    No tipping points. Global warming at 1.5°C would be largely not noticed. Gulf-of-America offshore oil rigs in the 1970s were designed for the stronger observable hurricanes this warmth was expected cause and further increasing averages global temperatures. This building for stronger possible hurricanes allowed science oriented persons wanting to bring public attention to increasing warming average global temperatures to come up with the promotional term "Climate Change" in 1981. This change in long term weather conditions these oil rigs were built for is comparable to a change of crops for different climates. The term Climate Change is scientifically representable from this logic keeping the persons behind it from being sighted with promoting nonsense.

    Former Greenpeace scientists state there is no unhealthy high limit for atmospheric carbon dioxide. 1200 ppm carbon dioxide is used in plant growing greenhouse for C3 plants over 90% of plant life on earth. C3 plants evolved 100s of millions of years ago with atmospheric carbon dioxide levels estimated in the rangesof 3000 ppm from plant fossils. Today's atmospheric carbon dioxide is about 400ppm far below what is optimum for most plants. 1200 ppm atmospheric carbon dioxide would greatly green the earth.  

    C4 plants evolved in the last 10 million years and work fine at today's low atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. 25% of food crops which includes cattle feed are C4 plants such as corn. C4 plant tends to be related to grasses. The typical cool season lawn grasses such as tall fescue, blue grass and perennial rye are C3 plants and love higher levels of carbon dioxide allowing them to use less water.

  2. Truly depressing reading these comments. Scientific consensus is clear. We should act now, the technology is here, we just have to adopt and invest in it instead of subsidizing and pushing oil and gas industries.

  3. I have followed global warming since the 1970s, imho it is already too late to stop it; at best we may slow it down long enough to come up with scientific solutions that could slowly reverse it. Trying to escape to Mars is not going to save anyone and all those huge rocket launches are just going to speed up our demise here on earth.

  4. The Pluvicopia book shows how the powerful tool works to control sea level at the scale of the problem. Please read it and advocate for numerical modeling of the hypothesis. It is critically important.

  5. If climate change was a true problem, the wealthiest would not be buying up all the ocean front properties and building mansions. “Climate change” has been a fear monger subject for many decades.

  6. The comments show that the oil lobby is working overtime to lie to us. Climate change is too real, and calamities happen yearly with geometrically increasing damage and deaths. Don't let the bots fool you; that's how we got Trump.

  7. Heh. I think China and a lot of other demographically bejanxed countries are already reducing humanities carbon footprint quite nicely. With continued shifts to biodiesel-electric and similar technologies we will be fine after all plants start dying of c02 starvation at about 150ppm, and we bottomed out at 200, I think we dodged a bullet.

  8. Once the process starts its irreversible!
    This isn't something anyone or any nation can just change at will.
    It started and that's a fact
    The Russian tundra is defrosting and that releases more carbon. There is evidence that the ocean current is also slowing. Storms are already getting stronger.

    People need to start converting to solar for everything. This will help when the world becomes frozen.

  9. " … if we act now …"

    I've been pounding the climate change drum since the first Earth Day, and to what effect? The fossil fuel industry has ramped up the pressure to "drill baby drill" and vastly enhanced the quality of its propaganda. I've pointed to the studies, to the data, to the irrefutable facts and I've been laughed out of one conservation after another. I've seen how quickly the changes are coming, and I believe we're past the point of no return. There are just too many stupid, greedy people to convince.

  10. When something is heated does it not expand. I agree on everything said here, but failed to mention that water expands as it is heated, thus would this not raise water levels. It changes weather, but what about weight, and plate tectonics, and eathquakes? I mention this as an after thought. Happy Easter 2025

  11. They can stop it all now they have zero point energy free clean unlimited energy. In simple terms you pull energy from the air but they have hidden the patterns as theres no money to be made from it. The governments could stop 99% of the worlds problems but they dont want to people.who run the world want more cash n power.

  12. No it isn’t. It’s natural change. And it’s to the benefit of all life. I want at least 1000ppm CO2 to help with yet more greening and warming.

  13. I find it hard to listen to anyone talking about this when they fail to mention the research done since the 1880`s that the Co2 does it`s highest temp increase in the first 200 ppm after that it gets to saturated to keep holding more as it goes up.

  14. From $10K to $110K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I think it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family…

  15. Speaking about year 1929, or 2030. Why does Trump/“Kings” want the Arctic, Antarctica, Greenland, Alaska and Canada?

    Probably very well aware of climate change, but so which alternatives are there, for us, or more specifically, for The Kings?

    Maybe deporting as many ordinary people as possible to the world’s warmest and hottest areas.

Leave a Reply to @obd1civic4door Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *