June 18, 2025

39 thoughts on “The INSANE Plan to Dim the Sun to Fight Climate Change

  1. First of all, this is not even feasible. The amount of effort this will require to make a difference is enormous and far beyond what any of these idiots can comprehend but they will do it anyway because, AGENDA. They blamed aerosols for global warming and destroying the ozone layer, now they want to re-introduce them on purpose. They say airplane contrails are contributing to global warming by forming clouds and trapping heat, but then this project intends to increase cloud cover. Reduced sun means a reduced food supply. The atmosphere is fluid and dynamic and these substances will not stay over the UK. They will move and disperse all over the world. It is the same ideological foundation as implementing electric vehicle mandates while dismantling the power supply. We are going to increase demand while reducing supply, thus making everything exponentially more expensive. You must use solar power, but we are going to turn off the sun.

  2. Take winter fuel payments away from the elderly & let them freeze with most expensive energy costs going in UK .Now dim the sun & make them need heating on 365 days of the year. The question I have to ask, who was using THE BRAIN CELL that is available in the entire UK government .

  3. The is beyond dumb, beyond insane. It's complete and total corruption, right in everyone's face. Where are all the right-wing lawyers who should be working to stop this great climate change con??

  4. If it was the US, DOGE would have shut this down. £50M is basically being "redistributed" to prove that shade – whether an umbrella or a natural or man-made cloud – is effective in controlling radiated heat. A school child knows as much.

  5. Tom Nelson is correct to point out that geoengineering has been around for 100 years and there is plenty evidence to show. I think the disregard the rest of the panel has for it is ironically how climate change believers see them. There is more credence in first addressing the subject in detail just as the entire climate change requires, than mocking it and a part of your audience. I can't imagine that attitude gaining a healthy growth considering an already niche viewer population. Honesty is good but sincerety is better.

  6. Well Bill Gates got away with the convid scamdemic without repurcusions (and more $Billions in the bank) so why not just get rid of the sun as well. I've got a better plan .Why don't we just get rid of Bill Gates instead? Problem solved!

  7. Dimming the sun will work really well with all those solar panels we are supposed to be destroying the environment with. A good example of the joined up thinking we can expect from our government. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤣😂

  8. Tom summed it up totally when he mentioned Gates. Who were two of the first that Starmer brought in not no.10? Bill Gates and Larry Fink. Starmers government have done everything they can to deny access to the records of those meetings. Even stating that no minutes were taken. Who believes that any meeting in a government building goes unrecorded? And now we have weather modification!

  9. I live on the south coast of England. What's the point of me getting beach body ready, if they are going to dim the sun? 😮‍💨 Granted, when I say beach body, I'm talking beached whale. 😄

  10. Britain would do a lot better to be spending that money on military defense instead of further wasting 'stupid money' on climate change that largely DOES NOT exist.

  11. If they went back to coal in old furnaces they could dim the sun, have enough electricity and stay warm all at once. They get dumber and dumber by the second. They will kill everything on earth by the time they get done.

  12. Dimming the sun? In England? Err. Ever been to England?? I live here. It's basically winter, 2 weeks of sun, then rain. We have naturally occurring clouds that dim our sun!!!

  13. The biggest problem with climate science in the first place is that the earth and the atmosphere are simply too large to conduct actual experiments on so therefore all the climate alarm conclusions are just untested guesses. Climate models have severe limitations, they are a tool to be used but they are far less reliable or scientific than conducting actual experiments following the scientific method. Politics, money, personal ideologies and bias all affect the messaging coming from climate studies. Trying to dim the sun’s effect on the earth with atmospheric particulate or potions is absolute insanity.

  14. Hey, let's dim the Sun! What could POSSIBLY go wrong?🤣🤣🤣
    I hope this supernaturally stupid idea doesn't end up on an episode of Unintended Consequences. The unbridled hubris of this concept is beyond belief. 🤦‍♀

  15. What a great Idea dim the sun The UK as a whole averages 1403 hours or 116 days of sun a year, and 150 days of rain. The UK is cloudy due to its geographical location. Moreover, the ocean currents impact Britain’s climate heavily, which causes the weather to remain gloomy or sunny.

Leave a Reply to @ianross5019 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *