
Bestselling author Alex Epstein reveals the reason behind the 2050 net zero obsession.
Mr Epstein’s comments come as Energy Minister Chris Bowen has claimed Australia’s transition to net zero energy –which it plans to do by 2050, will only cost $120 billion.
The Coalition meanwhile are pushing for more green energy investments by talking up nuclear energy reactors.
“The reason they are so obsessed with eliminating our impact on climate is they believe that human impact on earth is a bad thing,” Mr Epstein told Sky News Australia host Rita Panahi.
“It’s this immoral thing, and we should eliminate it at all costs, and that mentality is what leads net zero to have such catastrophic costs.
“And the advocates don’t care.”
source
the idea that they are going to achieve net zero by starving to death the people in all western countries should be considered a crime against Humanity.
When Australia's potential blackouts cause national security problems, then will those who ordered the installation of renewable energy while ignoring the warnings of the renewable energy limitations and failures be brought to trail?
CSIRO in a report stated it will cost over 1 trillipn dollars so for renewables ie…it will cost bucket loads
Off Course none of these Clowns will be in Government by 2050 , so this crap is exactly that,, CRAP
Maybe you should do a report on why Bill Gates is buying up all the farmland in America. He now owns 275000 acres across 19 counties.
It comes from a complete 'cult like' adherence to an impossible fantasy, by a group of completely stupid idiots.
Bowen is a dumb ass he has no clue
Net zero = slavery & hunger for the average person
The carbon thay want to get rid of is the human population
Not only will it cost a very large fortune, it will also have no impact on the climate.
Even worse, the climate doesn't even need 'fixing'.
Rita,
This Alex Epstien Bloke Wants Australia to Fail.
He Wants Us to Ignore Our Amazing Solar Energy Opportunity.
Alex is Just Another Excuse Factory Opposed to Superior Solar, Wind, Tidal/Wave, Geo-Thermal Energy Systems.
Rita, This Could be Pure Jealousy from Alex, be Careful Believing Him.
It's actually hard to take anyone seriously who uses the term 'Net Zero' regardless of political affiliation. It's a ridiculous completely unscientific concept. Can never possibly be achieved other by perhaps the complete extermination of the human race. Even then, not till everyone has completely rotted away.
Thailand has a population of 70+million
Power generation capacity(in 1000 gigawatt hours)
Natural gas 129.4
Imported fuel 30.34
Renewable en,g 23.18
Hydroelectricity 6.59
Diesel 0.88
Fuel oil 0.01
So with a population of 25 million why is Australia being forced into renewables
All part of the WEF plan.
Believe our impact is a bad thing. Ask any victim of an extreme weather event resulting in floods, bushfires, prolonged extremely hot days, prolonged droughts, crop failures etc. Are these so bad, because if we dont act it will get worse.
Humans are expendable. That's the mentality of the Net Zero lobby.
"A lot of this green agenda is being pushed because someone somewhere is making a lot of money from it. Just like in COVID, when of course there was a great redistribution of wealth to the most richest people in the world and the biggest corporations. As well as power being taken away from the likes of you and I." ~Robert Oulds
"1,500 private jets have flown in here to hear David Attenborough speak about how we're wrecking the planet." ~Rutger Bregman at Davos.
In 2050, carbon in the atmosphere will be higher then it is now, no matter we do in Australia. And guess what, there will be no difference in the climate. Total climate disaster will still be 10-12 years away, and western countries that have continued to pursue greeny agendas will be living in poverty still struggling to achieve the unachievable
All the trillions spent on “net zero” would be better spent on learning how to adapt to changing climate and weather (which isn’t really changing – it’s all a lie).
I agree they see humans as a virus and any change humans create as negative.
Easy. It is called the "Grand Solar Minimum" – and "they" are running out of time.
More people will suffer from net zero than any climate alarmist ideological prediction.
100% agree! In summary, the agenda is totally antihumanist!
Net Zero is a great goal, but as he says its the fixation with net zero at any cost (and the current cost is huge), what this guy says is very wise. Lets take the time to THINK a bit, come up with some sort of realistic plan? The issue is not what they want to achieve, its the method, the current method seems to be like hunting a fly with a bazooka, leaving devastation and misery in its wake. Lets just be realistic and dare I say conservative so that every step is sustainable and dont set deadlines that are unrealistic when there are too many unknowns. Lets just work together instead of the governments of the world painting everyone as climate deniers. Give us sensible plans and we will all be on board, make our live hell and we cannot be on board, we have children to protect and raise and the current apprach is making their future look rather grim.
I mean if you want some nuclear here, then lets start where we already have one, Lucus Heights. Some small modular units that can be setup far quicker. I mean Step 1 is is to convince the majority of the population here of the benefits. From there onto replacing the gas peaker plants.
The really big installations are like years to get through all of the planning/ objection caper. Then there is the time required to actually build one.
2023 was the hottest year ever yes. So much for all the money and effort thats been spent up to on net zero.
Pure Evil! 😈
And if possible they would prefer if most people and animals don’t breathe or fart again! 🙄
If C02 was actually a problem the first thing the WEF would do is abolish its annual meeting in Davos which attracts over 1000 private jets and uses loads of helicopters. They won't so neither should anyone else be concerned.
'Net-Zero' is nothing more than a scam hiding behind a fake, cultist 'new religion'.. It is designed to eke out the reserves of fossil fuels for the exclusive use of those who arrogantly consider themselves to be 'elites' by severely restricting their consumption by average citizens, whilst at the same time stealing as much cash as possible from the pockets of those average citizens and transferring it to the ever-open pockets of those who are already super-rich..
This is a lie. There is no evidence that man's contribution to greenhouse gases is having a detrimental effect on the environment.
Among thousands of Irish people who (emigrate) every year, with 59,600 having moved overseas in the year ending April 2022, the most recent figure available from the Central StaDtistics Office. Nearly half of those – 28,300 – were aged between 25-44, which can relay to the inbreeding on the Isle plus the terrible Job MLA's are intent on repeating could be the main cause of this, the Office of Culture has provided factual proof the number of outgoings far exceeded the amount incoming (personal) also known by loyalists as (emigrants) or known and named by such organisations as the PSNI as black ones.